“The bond that bends under weight and doesn’t break is the only kind worth having.”

🎵 Song of the Day: “Rescue” — Lauren Daigle — warm, steadfast, the hand that reaches in at the low.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Thursday Evening · Bybit + Bitcoin.com + Ted Pillows)

🟧 BTC: $81,000 (dipped to $79,694, reclaimed $82K, holding low-$81Ks) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,445 (+1% off the lows after a brutal morning)
🌐 XRP: $1.37 (steadied)
🟣 SOL: $109 (recovered)

The Test: BTC briefly broke $80K to $79,694, then bounced back above $82K — defended the 50-day line (~$80,250) and reclaimed
The Damage: ~$1B liquidated across the two days; BTC ETFs shed $261M; F&G cooled to 53 (neutral)
The Next Gate: Warsh speaks Friday + monthly options expire — the near-term catalysts
The Read (per Ted Pillows): structure intact but “untested by a close” — wants $84K to turn constructive, cuts risk on a daily close under $80K

Support: $80,000 (defended) → $79,694 (today’s low) → $79,000 → $77,200
Resistance: $82,000 (reclaimed) → $84,000 (the turn) → $87,200

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🛡️ $80K CRACKED — THEN BUYERS DRAGGED IT BACK. Per Bitcoin.com: Bitcoin broke below the line to an intraday low of $79,694, then staged a rapid recovery back above $82,000 within hours — defending its 50-day EMA (~$80,250) and reclaiming the level by the afternoon. The honest read: the floor didn’t hold comfortably, it held under duress — wicked below and got bought back. A support that gets briefly broken and immediately reclaimed is arguably stronger evidence than one that was never tested — it proved buyers are waiting right there. The line held the hard way, which is the only way that actually tells you anything.

🌏 A GLOBAL ROUT, NOT A BITCOIN ONE. Per KuCoin/Ted Pillows: the move was a broad risk-off — the selling “spread from inflation into the AI financing trade,” dragging equities worldwide and crypto with them. Bitcoin held its line while the Nasdaq broke, which earned a grudging “I respect that” even from cautious analysts — but it’s still moving with tech for now. The pressure came from the whole market, not from anything Bitcoin-specific — and BTC arguably weathered it better than the stocks that caused it. The decoupling isn’t clean, but the relative strength showed.

📅 WARSH + OPTIONS EXPIRY FRIDAY — THE NEXT TEST. Per Ted Pillows: the near-term catalysts stack up tomorrow — Fed’s Warsh speaks and monthly options expire — into a market that’s neutral (F&G 53) and defensive. The honest framing from the desks: structure’s intact but unproven by a close; constructive above $84K, risk-off under $80K on a daily close. Today held the line; tomorrow tests whether it sticks. The relationship between this market and its $80K floor gets one more pressure test before the week’s out.

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
Two days, ~$1B liquidated, a wick to $79,694 — leverage got punished while held spot rode it out and recovered. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no leverage, no single party that can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Hold the real thing through the test — with no single point of failure.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

🌅 THE THURSDAY THOUGHT — RELATIONSHIPS (PM EDITION)

The Bond That Bends And Holds

This morning $80,000 looked like it might break — and for a moment, it did, slipping to $79,694. Then buyers showed up and dragged it back. The line didn’t stay unbroken; it got pushed past, and then recovered. And there’s a truth about relationships hiding in that distinction: the strongest bonds aren’t the ones that never bend — they’re the ones that bend, strain, even crack a little, and come back.

We have a fantasy that a good relationship is one that never has a hard moment — no conflict, no rupture, no day it wobbles. But that’s not strength; that’s just a bond that’s never been tested, or one so rigid it’ll shatter the first real time it’s stressed. Real resilience in a relationship isn’t the absence of strain — it’s the recovery from it. The friendship that had the falling-out and repaired. The marriage that hit the hard year and came back closer. The trust that got dented and was rebuilt. Those bonds are stronger for having bent and held, because now both people have proof it can take weight and not break. A relationship that wicks to $79,694 and recovers tells you more than one that never left the comfort zone.

Don’t fear the moment a bond strains. Fear only the one that can’t come back. The bend-and-recover is how you know it’s real.

🪢 The strongest bonds bend and recover — they aren’t the unstrained ones.
🛠️ Resilience is the repair, not the absence of rupture.
⚓ A relationship that strained and came back is proven; one never tested is just untested.

$80K wicked and recovered — proof the buyers are real. The bonds in your life that bent and held are the proven ones. Trust those. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Is there a relationship you’ve quietly downgraded because it had a hard moment — a strain, a conflict, a crack — when the fact that it recovered is exactly what makes it one of your strongest?

One challenge tonight: Think of a bond that bent and came back. Instead of remembering it as “the time it almost broke,” name it for what it is: “the time it proved it could hold weight.” Then invest a little more in it — the proven ones deserve it. Bend-and-recover is the signature of the real thing.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Thursday, October 15th, 2026. My name is Matt.

First, I want to thank everybody who reached out after yesterday’s podcast. Francisco Pop, Kev, Spencer, Obsidian Enoch, and everybody else who sent comments and emails. I appreciate it. Apparently, my rant about artificial intelligence, data centers, and American manufacturing resonated with quite a few people.

And Kev, I’m glad you’re another Star Trek: The Next Generation fan. Picard was practically a father figure growing up. A lot of my ideas about morality, leadership, and how society should function came from that show.

Today, I want to continue that conversation because some of you raised excellent points. But we’re also going to discuss Bitcoin falling toward $80,000, inflation accelerating, and whether the enormous AI infrastructure boom is creating serious financial risks.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

AI Data Centers: Innovation, Energy and the Right to a Quiet Neighborhood

Obsidian Enoch made a great point yesterday. Data centers, artificial intelligence, post-quantum security, Bitcoin custody, energy, and tax policy are increasingly becoming part of the same infrastructure conversation. America cannot demand innovation and economic leadership while rejecting everything required to build it.

I completely agree.

But Spencer raised an equally important concern. What about somebody who moves into a rural community because they want peace and quiet? They buy a house, enjoy their property, and then the neighboring farmer sells 100 acres to a developer. Suddenly, there’s an enormous data center humming behind their backyard.

That’s a legitimate complaint.

We can’t simply dismiss people who don’t want industrial infrastructure appearing next to their homes. I live near Cleveland’s massive I-X Center, a former military manufacturing facility that has been discussed as a potential data center location. Even though it’s a couple of miles away, I wonder whether I’d hear the equipment humming at night.

That’s something communities deserve to understand before these projects get approved.

My friend Jason, who runs the Housing Nerd YouTube channel in Columbus, has been documenting the extraordinary data center expansion in central Ohio. One project he recently covered reportedly involves temporary, tent-like structures housing enormous amounts of computing equipment, with fuel-powered generators providing electricity.

Think about that. We’re building incredibly expensive AI infrastructure faster than we can connect it to the electrical grid.

And this exposes a much larger problem.

We want data centers, but we don’t want power plants. We don’t want solar farms taking up agricultural land. We don’t want wind turbines because they’re ugly or might harm birds. We don’t want transmission lines running through communities.

At some point, we have to build something.

I care about wildlife and the environment. Those concerns matter. But we need solutions, not an endless list of reasons why nothing can be constructed.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Is AI Becoming the Biggest Financial Bubble in American History?

Here’s where this conversation becomes much more serious.

I recently wrote about the scale of the AI infrastructure boom in The Angry Democrat. The figures I discussed estimated historical infrastructure investment at approximately 1% of the economy for electrification, 1.5% for the interstate highway system, and 2.5% for railroad development.

The current AI buildout was estimated at approximately 2.8% of the economy, including data centers, chips, electricity generation, transmission infrastructure, cooling, networking, and construction.

Those estimates aren’t perfectly comparable across historical periods, but they illustrate something important: AI infrastructure investment is enormous.

And what happens if this turns out to be a bubble?

We’re talking about companies borrowing substantial amounts of money to build infrastructure that could become technologically outdated much faster than expected.

Former Ohio Congressman Jim Renacci raised an interesting question when we discussed this. Computing technology continues becoming smaller and more efficient. If those improvements continue, will we need all these enormous data centers ten years from now?

I think that’s a legitimate question.

Most people don’t need a gigantic remote computing facility for their everyday tasks. Eventually, increasingly capable AI models could run directly on phones, laptops, or personal computers. Universities, research institutions, and major corporations will still need enormous computing resources, but does the average person?

And if companies overbuild, what happens to those facilities?

Northeast Ohio already has abandoned factories, warehouses, shopping centers, and commercial properties that nobody wants to maintain or demolish. We’ve watched entire industrial facilities sit empty for decades.

I don’t want communities left holding the bag for another generation of abandoned buildings.

But my biggest concern is the financial exposure. If AI spending is supporting a substantial portion of economic growth and stock-market valuations, a major correction could affect retirement accounts, pension funds, and ordinary investors.

I’m not predicting that AI will collapse. I’m saying the consequences of overinvestment deserve serious attention.

If you’re approaching retirement, this is exactly the kind of concentration risk you should be discussing with your financial adviser. Don’t assume the stock market will continue delivering enormous returns indefinitely.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin Drops Toward $80K as Inflation Hits 3.7%

Now, let’s get into Bitcoin, because we’re having a pretty ugly morning.

Bitcoin fell toward $80,000, with the price sitting around $80,970 when I recorded today’s show.

Inflation is the biggest immediate concern. The latest CPI figure came in at approximately 3.7% year over year, with gasoline prices reportedly increasing 7.1% during September.

That’s no bueno.

Higher energy prices are feeding inflation, and that complicates the Federal Reserve’s decisions about interest rates.

Just a few days ago, markets were pricing approximately a 78% probability of the Fed holding rates steady. Now that probability has moved much closer to a coin toss.

I think additional rate hikes are a real possibility.

The 10-year Treasury yield has eased slightly toward 5.1%, but I wouldn’t assume that decline will last.

We’re also seeing weakness in technology stocks. Nasdaq futures were down approximately 1.2% early this morning, and concerns about AI spending are beginning to affect Bitcoin.

Remember, these markets are connected. If investors start selling technology stocks and reducing exposure to risk assets, Bitcoin can get caught in that selling.

ETF flows aren’t helping either:

• October 12: Approximately $65 million in outflows

• October 13: Approximately $175 million in inflows

• October 14: Approximately $261 million in outflows

So where does Bitcoin go from here?

I’m still watching the $79,000 to $82,000 region. Bitcoin trading at $79,000 or even $78,500 doesn’t automatically mean we’ve entered a completely different market. We’re still testing the broader $80K area.

But if we lose that region decisively, I think $74,000 becomes a serious downside level to watch.

For a meaningful recovery, I want Bitcoin to reclaim $82K to $83K and establish those prices as support rather than repeatedly falling back through them.

Until then, we’re still dealing with the same frustrating market.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Institutional Crypto: Bitcoin Treasuries, Tokenization and Stablecoins

Despite the market weakness, institutional cryptocurrency adoption continues.

Another corporate Bitcoin buyer reportedly added approximately 2,822 BTC for $235 million, bringing its total holdings to around 35,595 Bitcoin.

These companies clearly aren’t approaching Bitcoin with a two-week investment horizon. They’re accumulating with the expectation that Bitcoin will remain an important financial asset over time.

And I think that’s the appropriate mindset. If you’re buying Bitcoin today because you expect to purchase a Lamborghini next month, you might want to reconsider your timeline.

We’re also seeing continued movement in tokenized financial assets. BNY and Citadel Securities are involved in efforts to bring U.S. Treasury exposure onto blockchain infrastructure, while Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin is expanding its role in brokerage settlement systems.

Standard Chartered continues projecting a $2 trillion stablecoin market by 2030.

I think that’s entirely possible.

Stablecoin issuers are becoming significant participants in the Treasury market because they hold short-term government securities as reserve assets. As stablecoin circulation expands, that relationship between cryptocurrency and traditional finance becomes increasingly important.

Meanwhile, EverNorth reportedly holds approximately 473 million XRP, worth around $648 million. The company intends to use its holdings through institutional strategies involving Ripple, Kraken, Coinbase, and BitGo, with potential expansion into lending, credit, and decentralized finance.

That’s a different approach from simply buying cryptocurrency and waiting for the price to appreciate.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

HEX Founder Richard Heart Reportedly Detained in Istanbul

Richard Heart, the controversial founder associated with HEX, PulseChain, and PulseX, has reportedly been detained in Istanbul.

Reports describe authorities seizing approximately $4 million in cash, 64 luxury watches, and electronic devices. Heart has faced allegations involving aggravated tax fraud from Finnish authorities.

These are reported allegations and enforcement developments, not a finding of guilt.

HEX reportedly fell approximately 25% following the news.

I know some listeners have been involved with HEX over the years, so this is obviously a significant development for that community.

And on a completely unrelated note, Istanbul is one of the most beautiful cities I’ve ever visited. Absolutely incredible place.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

It’s a bloody morning across the cryptocurrency market.

• Bitcoin: $80,970, down approximately 3%

• Ethereum: $2,360, down 5.5%

• BNB: $720, down 2.8%

• XRP: $1.30, down 4.8%

• Solana: $102, down 4.5%

• TRON: $0.33, down 0.6%

• Hyperliquid: $79.27, down 2.8%

• Zcash: $1,095, down almost 12%

• Total market cap: $2.7 trillion, down 3.2%

• Fear & Greed Index: 49, Neutral

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

Here’s what I’m watching.

First, Bitcoin needs to defend the broader $80,000 region. If we start establishing sustained trading below that level, I become much more concerned about a move toward $74K.

Second, inflation and interest rates are creating serious pressure on risk assets. Higher borrowing costs could also become a problem for companies financing enormous AI infrastructure projects with debt.

And third, I think we need to have a much more sophisticated conversation about the AI boom.

I’m excited about artificial intelligence. I want America building the infrastructure, creating jobs, and leading technological development. But that doesn’t mean every data center makes economic sense, every community should accept one, or every company investing billions in AI will earn a reasonable return.

We can support technological progress while questioning whether we’re overbuilding, whether communities are protected, and whether investors understand the risks.

That’s the conversation I want to have.

We’re also watching upcoming retail sales, producer price inflation, and jobless claims, all of which could influence market expectations before the Fed’s October 27–28 meeting.

Thanks again to everybody who participated in yesterday’s discussion. I appreciate the feedback, including the disagreements. That’s what makes these conversations worthwhile.

I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Happy HODLing

“Faith is not belief that the outcome will be good. It’s the strength to stand when it isn’t.”

🎵 Song of the Day: “Blackbird” — The Beatles — tender, resilient, learning to fly on a broken wing.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Wednesday Evening · The Block + Bitcoin.com + CryptoTimes)

🟧 BTC: $81,900 (-2.3% · hot CPI → broke $82K, tapped $81,500) ⚠️
🔵 ETH: $2,440 (-3% · led the downside) ⚠️
🌐 XRP: $1.38 (-3.5%)
🟣 SOL: $111 (-3%)

The Print: September CPI +3.7% YoY (vs 3.6% exp), core +0.3% MoM (vs 0.2%) — hotter than hoped, gasoline +9.1%
The Consequence: an October Fed hike is “back on the table” (Ledn’s Wu, Sygnum) — the dovish Williams hope got overruled by the data
The Damage: ~$331M liquidated, bullish traders hit hardest; BTC cracked the $82–83K support
The Line: $81,500 is where intraday selling stabilized · $80,400 the deeper floor

Support: $81,500 (today’s low) → $80,400 → $80,000 → $78,000
Resistance: $82,000 (reclaim) → $83,000 → $84,000 (50-day SMA)

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🌡️ CPI RAN HOT — AND THE HOPE TRADE UNWOUND. Per The Block: September inflation accelerated to 3.7% YoY with core at 0.3% MoM — both above expectations — and Bitcoin, which had firmed overnight on dovish Fed hope, reversed hard, breaking $82,000 to tap $81,500. This is the morning’s “first step before the staircase” meeting its answer: the data came in, and it wasn’t the one hope wanted. The step was taken on a crack of light; the number pulled the next stair. It’s a real setback — an October hike is back in play — and the honest Faith read is that this is exactly the kind of moment conviction is actually for.

🏛️ AN OCTOBER HIKE IS BACK ON THE TABLE. Per Sygnum Bank and Ledn’s Thomas Wu: “A hotter core at 0.3% puts an October hike back on the table after a soft jobs report.” The dovish Williams comment that lifted markets this morning got overruled by the inflation print less than 12 weeks before the Oct 27–28 Fed meeting. Higher-for-longer rates mean higher Treasury yields and a stronger dollar — the exact vise that’s capped Bitcoin all month, now tightening again. The macro headwind that briefly loosened yesterday snapped back today. The climb resumes against the Fed, not with it.

🐂 SAYLOR CALLED THE BEAR OVER — JUST BEFORE THE DIP. Per Bitcoin.com: in a notable bit of timing, Michael Saylor declared the bear market over just before today’s sell-off — a reminder that even the most committed bulls don’t control the next candle. But read it the right way for the Faith pillar: Saylor’s call was never about this week’s price; it’s a multi-year structural thesis, and he kept buying through every dip this year to back it. A hot CPI doesn’t refute a decades-long conviction — it tests the holders of it. The ones who sell on the print didn’t have the conviction; the ones who hold did.

🗝️ Powered By Bitkey

Your keys. Your coins. No single point of failure.
A $331M liquidation day is leverage getting punished — again — while self-custodied spot just rides through. Bitkey is self-custody done right: a 2-of-3 setup across your phone, a hardware device, and a recovery key, so you hold your coins, no exchange to get liquidated on, no single seed to lose. Hold the real thing, unlevered, and let a hot number be just a number.
Not financial advice. Just your keys, your coins — done safely. 🗝️

🌅 THE WEDNESDAY THOUGHT — FAITH (PM EDITION)

Faith That Only Survives Good News Isn’t Faith

This morning the market had hope — a dovish Fed voice, a step up on a crack of light. This afternoon the CPI came in hot and pulled the stair out. And here’s the honest test hiding in that reversal: the faith that evaporates the moment the news turns bad was never really faith. It was just optimism wearing faith’s clothes.

It’s easy to “believe” when the data’s cooperating — when the number comes in soft, the price is green, the outcome breaks your way. That’s not conviction; that’s just agreeing with good news. Real faith is defined entirely by what happens when the news turns against you — when the print is hot, the stair pulls out, and the reasons to quit stack up in plain sight. That’s the only moment faith actually exists, because that’s the only moment it costs something to hold. Anyone can stand when the ground is firm. Faith is what keeps you standing when it isn’t — not a belief the outcome will be good, but the strength to hold your ground when it clearly isn’t today.

The hot CPI didn’t break anything real — the 21 million, the adoption, the reasons are all exactly where they were this morning. It just tested who actually believes. Let it find you still standing.

🔥 Faith that needs good news to survive was never faith — just optimism in disguise.
🪨 Conviction is defined by the bad-news moment — that’s the only time it costs anything.
⚓ Don’t believe the outcome will be good; be strong enough to stand when it isn’t.

The number was hot; the reasons didn’t change. Let the bad day find you still standing — that’s what faith actually is.⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Is your conviction — in Bitcoin, in a plan, in yourself — the kind that only holds when the news is good, or the kind that can stand on a day the data comes in hot and the stair pulls out?

One challenge tonight: Take the belief that got tested today and ask the honest question: did the actual reasons change, or just the price/the news? If the reasons stand, hold — deliberately, on the hard day, because that’s the only day holding means anything. Faith that survives only good news isn’t faith. Be the one still standing.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

Good morning, everybody.

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Wednesday, October 14th, 2026. My name is Matt.

Bitcoin is holding around $83,000, inflation remains a concern, and we’re watching the Federal Reserve. But today’s show went in a completely different direction. We started with crypto and ended up talking about AI consciousness, data centers, American manufacturing, and Star Trek. Some of the opposition to these developments is driving me crazy.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Bitcoin Holds $83K as Inflation Concerns Continue

Bitcoin remains around $83,000 as markets prepare for another inflation report. CPI is expected to come in around 3.6% year over year, largely because of higher energy prices. Brent crude is trading around $106 a barrel, and the 10-year Treasury yield is near 5.2%.

New York Fed President John Williams has indicated he doesn’t currently see a need for additional rate hikes in 2027. I’m not necessarily buying that, but markets are assigning approximately a 78% probability that the Fed holds rates steady in October.

Bitcoin ETFs are showing some improvement. After substantial outflows on October 7th and 8th, approximately $110 million flowed back in yesterday. That’s encouraging, but Bitcoin still needs to break out of the trading range we’ve been discussing for weeks.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Standard Chartered Expands Crypto Banking as France Considers a 31.4% Tax

Standard Chartered is allowing eligible wealthy clients in the United Arab Emirates to buy Bitcoin and Ethereum through their existing bank accounts. The bank handles custody and settlement, so customers don’t need a separate exchange account or external wallet. That’s a significant institutional adoption story. Bitcoin is becoming another investment available through your bank. I just hope Standard Chartered knows what it’s doing with custody, because that’s an enormous responsibility.

Meanwhile, French lawmakers are considering a proposal involving a 31.4% capital gains tax on certain crypto transactions, including Bitcoin-to-stablecoin trades. Crypto-to-crypto trades can already trigger taxes in places like the United States, so that part isn’t unusual. But 31.4%? That’s a lot.

If you invest $10,000 in Bitcoin and it grows to $20,000, you’ve made a $10,000 gain. At 31.4%, that’s $3,140 in taxes, leaving $6,860 of your profit.

I hate how we tax ordinary investors. I don’t mind taxing wealthy individuals, but I think we should consider significantly reducing or eliminating capital gains taxes below a certain net-worth threshold. Maybe that’s $1 million, maybe $3 million or $5 million. But imagine a family making $100,000 a year that turns a $5,000 investment into $75,000. That’s life-changing money, and depending on how long they held it, the gains could be taxed at ordinary income rates. I think that’s ridiculous. We should encourage people to build wealth, not punish them for taking a chance.

And don’t get me started on government waste. Are we getting our money’s worth from the taxes we pay?

In the Philippines, Coins.ph, an exchange serving more than 18 million customers, reportedly faces potential enforcement action over transactions associated with restricted offshore gambling businesses. Its operating license could be at risk.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Coinbase Wants Bitcoin to Prepare for Quantum Computing

Coinbase is calling for Bitcoin to begin preparing for post-quantum cryptography now, rather than waiting until sufficiently powerful quantum computers exist. And I completely agree.

Coinbase reportedly custodies approximately 5% of all Bitcoin in existence. Its recommendations include flexible post-quantum signatures, gradual migration, backup quantum-resistant keys, and separating the question of lost Bitcoin from immediate security upgrades.

We’ve spent a lot of time this week discussing whether AI could eventually discover mathematics that threatens existing cryptography. Quantum computing is a different threat, but the lesson is the same. These upgrades require planning and coordination. Don’t wait for an emergency.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Are We Actually Approaching the Question of AI Consciousness?

I was talking with a friend yesterday about something I find absolutely fascinating: Can artificial intelligence become conscious? We’re not talking about Isaac Asimov writing science fiction. Serious people are having serious conversations about this right now.

My friend is religious. He believes consciousness comes from God, that human beings have souls, and that machines can’t become conscious just because somebody writes sophisticated software. I understand his perspective, and I’m not saying today’s AI systems are conscious.

But imagine a child growing up with a robotic nanny. It reads bedtime stories, remembers their friends, helps with homework, and talks with them about their day. That child might see the robot as a genuine companion. What happens when somebody insists it’s nothing more than code?

We’re going to have people who say machines can never possess consciousness and others who argue that advanced AI deserves moral consideration. We’re watching the beginning of that conversation right now, and I think it’s extraordinary.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

You Can’t Demand American Manufacturing and Oppose Every New Industry

Everybody says they want manufacturing back in America. They want good-paying jobs and investment in their communities. But somebody proposes an AI data center, and suddenly everybody loses their minds. It’ll use electricity, require water, create traffic, and take up space. Well, what the hell do you think industry does?

My grandfather had a metal-stamping factory in Cleveland surrounded by houses. Machines stamped metal all day and night, and the factory supported families throughout the neighborhood. That’s what industrial communities looked like.

Now we’re talking about billion-dollar data centers employing electricians, pipefitters, ironworkers, plumbers, and other skilled tradespeople, many in good-paying union jobs. People dismiss those jobs as temporary. Of course they are. That’s how construction works.

And here’s what gets me: we’re willing to put taxpayer money into a new Browns stadium, but technology infrastructure becomes controversial because people don’t want it nearby. I understand legitimate concerns about subsidies, water, energy, and what happens if these facilities become obsolete. Northeast Ohio is full of abandoned industrial buildings. But those are reasons for responsible development policies, not reasons to oppose everything.

We can’t demand an industrial economy while rejecting the infrastructure needed to build it.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

We Grew Up Wanting Star Trek. Now We’re Fighting Against It.

I grew up watching Star Trek: The Next Generation. Captain Picard could ask the computer to do something, and it understood him. The holodeck could create an entire fictional world with characters and experiences. Nobody watching in the 1990s complained about programmers losing their jobs or the computer destroying creativity. We thought it was cool as hell.

We wanted intelligent computers, video calls, robots, and machines that could help us do extraordinary things. Now we’re beginning to build them, and suddenly people are fighting against them.

Look at SpaceX. For years, the United States relied on Russian spacecraft to carry American astronauts to the International Space Station. Then SpaceX developed an American commercial alternative. You don’t have to like Elon Musk or agree with his politics to recognize that achievement. We should evaluate technologies on their merits, not the personalities involved.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Crypto Prices

• Bitcoin: $83,380, up 0.2%

• Ethereum: $2,500, up 0.2%

• BNB: $741, up 0.5%

• XRP: $1.37, up 1.2%

• Solana: $107, up 0.9%

• TRON: $0.333, up 1.5%

• Zcash: $1,240, up 4.6%

• Hyperliquid: $81.60, down 0.5%

• Total market cap: $2.8 trillion, up 0.2%

• Fear & Greed Index: 54, Neutral

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

My Take

I’ve been thinking a lot about where I stand politically, particularly on technology. I’ve spent my life excited about the future, and I’m frustrated that so much of the conversation seems focused on stopping it. When I started podcasting about crypto in 2017, people dismissed Bitcoin and blockchain because somebody made a ridiculous meme coin. Now we’re having similar arguments about AI, robotics, autonomous vehicles, and data centers.

I don’t want to eliminate oversight, hand corporations unlimited subsidies, or ignore environmental concerns. I want us to talk about how to build these technologies responsibly, instead of simply trying to prevent them from existing. That’s why I got interested in crypto in the first place. I saw the possibility of giving ordinary people greater financial access, control, and opportunity. I think AI could be even more transformative.

I want America to help build that future, and I want ordinary people to benefit from it. Anyway, I know today’s show went off the rails a little. I’ve got more crypto news, but I’m saving it for tomorrow.

Let me know what you think on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or at matt@dailycryptonews.net. I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

Happy HODLing

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort.”
— John Ruskin

🎵 Song of the Day: “Solid” — Ashford & Simpson — warm, grounded, built on something real.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Tuesday Evening · Yahoo + Coinbase + CoinGape)

🟧 BTC: $83,450 (+1.3% · bounced off $81,017 to $84,074, holding mid-$83Ks) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,519 (+0.3% · steadied)
🌐 XRP: $1.42 (recovered)
🟣 SOL: $111 (steadied)

The Tell: the rebound was spot-buyer-led — leveraged traders and ETF investors stayed away (the healthy kind)
The Decoupling Held: BTC rose while Asian equities had a “bloodbath”; BTC/KOSPI correlation ~−0.41 — a real divergence
The Macro Assist: global bond yields eased, oil slipped on Trump’s ceasefire comments — safe-haven bid helped
The Catalyst: September CPI — Thursday · the last inflation print before the Oct 28 Fed

Support: $82,000 → $81,017 (today’s low) → $80,329
Resistance: $84,074 (today’s high) → $85,000 → $87,374

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

💪 A SPOT-LED BOUNCE — THE HEALTHY KIND. Per Yahoo Finance: Bitcoin recovered from an overnight low near $81,017 back to ~$84,000, and the character of the bounce is what matters — spot buyers led it, while leveraged traders and ETF investors stayed on the sidelines. That’s the opposite of the fragile, squeeze-driven pops that collapse as fast as they come. A recovery built on people buying actual Bitcoin to hold — not on borrowed money or forced short-covering — is the kind that tends to stick. Real demand, real hands, real floor. After a week of leverage getting flushed, the market is rebuilding on a sounder footing.

🔀 THE DECOUPLING HELD A SECOND DAY. Per Bitcoin News Digest: Bitcoin rose today while Asian equities had a “bloodbath” — the KOSPI and chip stocks tumbling — and the 20-week BTC/KOSPI correlation now sits near −0.41, a genuine inverse relationship. Two sessions running, Bitcoin has caught a safe-haven bid as stocks fell, rather than falling with them. That’s the “digital gold” behavior the thesis predicts, showing up when it counts — during an equity scare, not a calm day. One data point was a curiosity; two is a pattern worth watching closely into CPI.

🕊️ YIELDS EASED, OIL SLIPPED — THE VISE LOOSENED. Per CoinGape: global bond yields fell and oil slipped (partly on Trump’s comments about a coming ceasefire), easing two of the pressures that hammered crypto last week. For the first time in a stretch, the macro helped instead of hurt. The headwind that capped Bitcoin all month briefly became a tailwind today — and it’s a reminder that the same external forces that pushed price down can reverse and lift it just as fast. CPI Thursday is the next test of whether the loosening holds.

🩸 Powered By Rythm Health

Don’t trust. Verify — your own body.
Bitcoiners live by one rule: verify, don’t trust. Rythm brings it to your health — an at-home blood test, painless, tracking 25+ biomarkers with results in about 48 hours and an app that shows your trends over time, not a once-a-year guess. Cholesterol, hormones, vitamin D, metabolic markers: real numbers, in your hands, monthly. You verify your money. Verify your body the same way.
Get 30% off your first test: rythm.health
Not medical advice — Rythm isn’t a substitute for your doctor. Just your own health data, in your own hands. 🩸

🌅 THE TUESDAY THOUGHT — FINANCIAL (PM EDITION)

Judge The Bounce By What’s Underneath

Bitcoin bounced hard today — but a bounce isn’t a bounce. The pros didn’t just celebrate the green candle; they looked underneath it and found something that mattered more than the number: this recovery was led by spot buyers, not leverage. People buying real Bitcoin to hold, not gamblers borrowing to chase. Same +3% on the screen as a squeeze would show — completely different quality underneath.

This is the financial discipline almost nobody practices: judge a result by its composition, not just its direction. Two outcomes can look identical on the surface and be opposites underneath. The promotion built on real skill versus the one built on office politics. The revenue from loyal customers versus the kind bought with unsustainable discounts. The recovery built on genuine demand versus the one built on borrowed money. They read the same on the scoreboard — and age completely differently, because what a thing is made of determines whether it lasts. The amateur asks “did it go up?” The professional asks “up on what?”

Don’t just check whether something worked. Check what it was built on — because the composition, not the headline, tells you if it’ll hold.

🔬 Judge results by composition, not just direction — same candle, different quality.
🧱 Spot-built lasts; leverage-built collapses — in markets and in life.
⚓ Ask not “did it go up?” but “up on what?”

Today’s bounce was spot-built — the kind that holds. Look underneath your wins too. What they’re made of decides if they last. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Think of a recent “win” — did you check what it was built on, or just that it happened? Was it spot-built (real, durable) or leverage-built (borrowed, fragile)?

One challenge tonight: Take one result you’re relying on — an income stream, a relationship, a position — and inspect its composition. Is it built on something real and repeatable, or on borrowed momentum that could vanish? If it’s leverage-built, start converting it to spot. What a thing is made of is what decides whether it survives the next flush. ⚓

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

WATCH THIS!

It’s Monday, October 12th, 2026, and Craig Cobb is back with another cryptocurrency market update.

Bitcoin has bounced after testing $80,000, the weekly chart remains in an uptrend, and several cryptocurrencies are beginning to show signs of renewed strength.

But there’s a problem.

The market still isn’t producing the clean trends and reliable trading setups Craig wants to see.

After three consecutive weeks of gains, last week’s pullback wasn’t particularly surprising. The question now is whether Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market can build on the rebound or whether we’re heading into another period of sideways consolidation.

Before we get into the charts, check out Craig’s trading education and market analysis:

Start your free 7-day trial of Market Intern:

https://marketintern.com

Subscribe to Craig Cobb’s free Tuesday newsletter:

https://www.thegrowmeco.com

Bitcoin’s Weekly Uptrend Survives the Selloff

Bitcoin finished last week down approximately 3.2%, although the decline was considerably worse earlier in the week.

At one point, Bitcoin was down roughly 7%, falling toward $80,350 before buyers stepped in and pushed prices higher.

Craig isn’t particularly concerned about the pullback itself.

The market had just experienced three consecutive positive weeks, gaining approximately 5.6%, 4%, and 2.5%.

After that kind of upward movement, a period of selling isn’t unusual.

More importantly, Bitcoin’s weekly chart continues to show an uptrend.

Craig identifies that trend through a series of higher highs and higher lows. Under his methodology, a higher low requires a particular candle structure, not simply a brief dip followed by a rebound.

And by that definition, the weekly uptrend remains intact.

Could Bitcoin fall further?

Absolutely.

Craig believes the market could pull back deeper into its moving-average zone without necessarily damaging the larger bullish structure.

The important thing is whether Bitcoin maintains its established higher low.

As long as that structure survives, the weekly trend remains constructive.

The Three-Month Bitcoin Chart Could Signal the End of the Bear Market

One of Craig’s most important observations continues to come from Bitcoin’s three-month chart.

He’s been discussing this particular candle formation for several weeks, and it remains central to his longer-term outlook.

Bitcoin produced a bullish three-month candle after a significant pullback into its moving-average cradle zone.

According to Craig’s historical research, that formation has frequently appeared near major market bottoms.

He believes the pattern raises the probability that Bitcoin has already established its bear-market low.

But there’s still an important confirmation missing.

Bitcoin needs to break above the high of that bullish three-month candle.

Craig considers that breakout a potentially significant signal that the broader market is transitioning into a sustained recovery.

The monthly chart has also improved.

Bitcoin is no longer in a confirmed monthly downtrend, but Craig isn’t calling it a monthly uptrend either.

For now, the monthly structure is neutral.

That leaves the market in an interesting position.

The longer-term charts are showing increasingly positive developments, but the shorter-term price action hasn’t provided the confirmation Craig wants.

And that’s why he’s remaining patient.

Bitcoin and Ethereum Still Need Cleaner Daily Trends

On the daily chart, Bitcoin continues to struggle with resistance.

The market has produced lower highs and lower lows in the shorter term, but Craig doesn’t consider the movement a particularly strong or orderly downtrend.

Instead, Bitcoin is behaving more like a choppy, sideways market.

It has tested resistance, pulled back, and failed to establish the consistent rhythm that makes trend trading attractive.

Craig calls that rhythm cyclicity.

He’s looking for a recognizable pattern of higher highs, higher lows, orderly pullbacks, and continuation moves.

Without that structure, there simply aren’t as many high-quality trading opportunities.

Ethereum is showing similar behavior.

After pulling back toward previous highs on the weekly chart, Ethereum is attempting to climb out of its consolidation zone.

The question is whether ETH can reclaim and hold above its moving averages or whether another leg lower is coming.

Craig isn’t making a firm prediction.

There isn’t enough evidence on the chart yet.

And when the chart doesn’t provide an answer, Craig would rather wait than manufacture a trading opportunity.

Solana, XRP, Zcash and the Rest of the Market

Looking across the major cryptocurrencies, Craig sees a mixture of promising longer-term structures and disappointing shorter-term price action.

BNB and Dogecoin: Both charts remain messy. Dogecoin looks particularly weak, with greater downside pressure and little in the way of clean trading structure. Craig also reminds traders that Dogecoin remains a meme coin, regardless of its market capitalization.

Solana: The weekly chart looks more constructive. SOL has pulled back into an attractive area within an established uptrend, creating the possibility of another higher low. However, Craig wants to see the daily chart continue moving higher before becoming more interested.

XRP: The daily chart shows a clearer downtrend, with lower highs and lower lows. There’s little evidence of a confirmed reversal yet.

TRON: The market remains choppy and sideways, offering few compelling setups.

Zcash: ZEC is showing renewed strength after pulling back toward approximately $1,100. On the weekly chart, the cryptocurrency experienced a substantial rally, retraced toward its 10-period moving average, and is now beginning to move away from that level. Craig sees some encouraging signs.

Hyperliquid: HYPE continues displaying its familiar behavior of strong rallies followed by extended consolidation. But the current chart lacks the clarity needed for a compelling trade.

Monero: XMR has remained relatively strong, benefiting from renewed interest in privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. However, Craig still doesn’t see a particularly clean setup.

The overall message is consistent.

Some cryptocurrencies are improving.

Others remain weak.

But across the market, Craig is still waiting for better technical confirmation.

Total Crypto Market Cap Holds $2.72 Trillion Support

One encouraging development is happening in the broader cryptocurrency market.

Craig had previously identified approximately $2.72 trillion as an important resistance level for total crypto market capitalization.

Following the recent pullback, the market returned to test that area.

And so far, it has held as support.

That’s a constructive development.

Previous resistance becoming support is something traders frequently watch for when evaluating whether an uptrend can continue.

But Craig wants more.

He wants total cryptocurrency market capitalization to break above its recent highs and begin establishing another leg higher.

That would suggest broader participation across the market and potentially create more attractive trading opportunities.

For now, the market has defended an important level without producing a decisive breakout.

Three Altcoins on Craig Cobb’s Watchlist

Although the broader market remains difficult to trade, Craig is watching three specific cryptocurrencies for potential setups.

Stacks (STX)

Craig is monitoring a resistance level that has already been tested several times.

The chart has also produced a higher low, creating the possibility of a breakout setup.

But the structure needs to develop further.

Craig wants to see price build toward resistance with better convergence before considering a trade.

Aerodrome Finance (AERO)

AERO is on Craig’s watchlist for a potential four-hour cradle trade.

He would prefer a slightly deeper pullback toward approximately $0.90, followed by a small bullish candle within the moving-average zone.

That would provide the kind of structured entry he looks for when trading with an established trend.

Aptos (APT)

Aptos is also developing a four-hour uptrend.

Craig is watching for an orderly sequence of higher highs and higher lows, followed by a controlled pullback and bullish continuation signal.

He’s not looking for enormous price movements or speculative breakouts.

He’s looking for clean, repeatable setups with recognizable trend structure.

Craig Cobb’s Take: Sometimes the Best Trade Is No Trade

Craig’s outlook is becoming more constructive, but he’s not ready to declare that the market has fully recovered.

Bitcoin’s weekly trend remains positive.

The three-month chart is showing a potentially important bullish formation.

Solana and Zcash have encouraging technical characteristics.

And total crypto market capitalization has held an important support level.

Those are positive developments.

But the market still needs to prove itself.

Craig wants to see Bitcoin and the broader market break through resistance and establish stronger trends on the two-hour, four-hour, and eight-hour charts.

Until then, the trading opportunities remain limited.

And that’s fine.

Trading isn’t about constantly being in a position.

It’s about waiting for the market to produce an opportunity that fits your strategy.

Craig’s approach remains focused on trading established trends, buying orderly pullbacks, and avoiding unnecessary risk when the charts are unclear.

His outlook is cautiously bullish, but his immediate trading posture is patient.

As Craig puts it:

“There’s a time to be long, there’s a time to be short, there’s a time to go fishing.”

And right now, it might be a good week to go fishing.

Of course, cryptocurrency markets can change quickly.

A breakout above resistance could bring trading opportunities back into focus almost immediately.

Until then, patience remains the priority.

For more of Craig Cobb’s technical analysis, trading education, and market commentary, visit Market Intern at

https://marketintern.com

And don’t forget to subscribe to his free Tuesday newsletter at

https://www.thegrowmeco.com

Have a wonderful week.

Happy HODLing

“Within you, there is a stillness and a sanctuary to which you can retreat at any time.”
— Hermann Hesse

🎵 Song of the Day: “Quiet” — Lights — hushed, suspended, the calm held before a release.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Monday Evening · CoinDesk + CryptoTicker + Bitcoin.com)

🟧 BTC: $82,700 (-1.2% · tapped $84,250, faded, coiled on $82,500) ⚠️
🔵 ETH: $2,540 (gave back the morning’s outperformance)
🌐 XRP: $1.40 (steady)
🟣 SOL: $115 (easing)

The Pivot: $82,500 is the level that decides direction into CPI — hold it and $84K/$85K reopen; lose it and $80,329 (the low) is back in play
The Caution: analysts (Kibar) warn the recent breakout “lacks fuel” up here; momentum fading under $84K
The Catalyst: September CPI — Wednesday 8:30 AM ET — the last inflation print before the Oct 28 Fed decision
The Structure: still comfortably above September’s $74,913 low and the long-term moving averages — the recovery hasn’t unraveled

Support: $82,500 (the pivot) → $80,329 (the low) → $78,000
Resistance: $84,000 → $85,000 → $87,374 (recent peak)

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🪤 THE BREAKOUT “LACKS FUEL” — FOR NOW. Per KuCoin/Finbold: Bitcoin tapped $84,250, couldn’t hold it, and faded to ~$82,700 — and analyst Aksel Kibar flagged that the recent move “lacks fuel” up at these levels, needing a strong rebound above $82,800 to avoid slipping back toward the lower range. It’s the honest near-term read: after a $1B flush and $681M of outflows, the tank for an immediate breakout is low. The market isn’t failing — it’s refueling, sitting still while it waits for a catalyst to fill the tank. That catalyst has a date: Wednesday.

⏳ $82,500 IS THE LINE THAT DECIDES CPI WEEK. Per CryptoTicker: desks are converging on one level — $82,500 is the pivot heading into Wednesday’s CPI. Hold it through the print and the path back to $84–85K reopens; lose it and October’s $80,329 low comes back into view. Everything right now is coiled around that line, waiting. The stillness is the market holding its breath before the one number that sets the tone into the Oct 28 Fed meeting.Positioning, not direction — the real move waits for the data.

🧱 THE FOUNDATION IS STILL INTACT. Per Bitcoin.com: despite the near-term tug-of-war, Bitcoin remains comfortably above September’s $74,913 low and its longer-term moving averages — the broader recovery “has yet to unravel.” The bears have a modest short-term edge, but the structural picture is unchanged: a market consolidating withinan uptrend, not breaking down out of one. Short-term chop, long-term floor intact — the coiled spring is resting on solid ground, not slipping off a ledge. Which direction it releases is Wednesday’s question.

💍 Powered By Oura

Measure the reserve you can’t feel.
Week 2 is Sleep — and a coiled, waiting market is its own quiet stress, the kind that tightens your body before your mind clocks it. CPI lands Wednesday; the clear-headed response you’ll want is built on the rest you bank tonight. Oura reads what you can’t: HRV, resting heart rate, whether the waiting is quietly taxing you. It’s on-chain data for your nervous system. The market’s coiled. Make sure you’re resting, not clenching.
See your baseline: Get your Oura Ring here.
Not medical advice. Just the data your body was already keeping. 💍

🌅 THE MONDAY THOUGHT — HEALTH · WEEK 2: SLEEP (PM EDITION)

Stillness Is Loading, Not Nothing

Bitcoin barely moved today — tapped a high, faded, then sat coiled on $82,500, waiting for Wednesday. To an impatient eye, that looks like nothing happening. But it’s the opposite: it’s a spring compressing, energy loading, the pause that precedes a move rather than the absence of one. And learning to see stillness as loading instead of nothing is one of the quiet keys to rest — and to sleep.

We’ve been trained to equate stillness with waste. If we’re not doing, we feel we’re falling behind — so we fill every quiet moment, resist every pause, treat rest as time stolen from productivity. But that’s exactly backwards, and your body knows it even when your mind won’t admit it. Sleep looks like nothing happening — you’re lying there, inert, unproductive. In reality it’s the most active repair-and-consolidation process you run all day: memories filing, tissue rebuilding, the system reloading the energy tomorrow will spend. The stillness isn’t the absence of progress. It’s where the progress is quietly manufactured, out of sight. The coiled spring isn’t idle. It’s loaded.

Tonight, when you lie still and feel like nothing’s happening — trust that everything is. Stillness is loading. Let it.

🌀 Stillness isn’t nothing — it’s energy loading for what’s next.
😴 Sleep looks inert and is your most active repair process.
⚓ Don’t resist the pause; it’s where tomorrow gets built.

BTC’s coiled, not idle. You are too, when you rest. Let the stillness load you. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Do you treat your own stillness — rest, sleep, the quiet pause — as wasted time, or as the loading phase where tomorrow’s energy and clarity actually get built?

One challenge tonight: When you lie down and the restless voice says “you should be doing something,” answer it honestly: I am — I’m loading. Let the stillness be productive on its own terms. The coiled spring looks idle and is anything but. So are you, resting. ⚓

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

WATCH THIS!

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Monday, October 12th, 2026. My name is Matt.

And this is my sixth take this morning.

Matt didn’t sleep last night.

My brain is fuzzy, my mouth is mushy, and my eyes are blurry. I went to bed around 11, probably fell asleep around 11:30, and woke up at four o’clock in the morning. Then I spent another hour and a half scrolling through my phone instead of going back to sleep.

I had a couple of beers last night, they didn’t sit well with me, and now here we are.

So bear with me this morning because I’m not recording this again.

Before we get into the news, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. You can also send me an email at matt@dailycryptonews.net.

And a couple of quick shout-outs.

SRT Scat left a comment saying the show has become part of their routine and helps them stay informed while they’re on the go. Thank you very much.

And underscore Caitlin sent a shout-out from Calgary, Canada, saying they’re here for the rants and insights.

Well, you’re definitely getting a rant today.

Because I spent a good portion of the weekend going down a rabbit hole about artificial intelligence, mathematics and the possibility that AI could eventually threaten the cryptography securing Bitcoin, Ethereum and much of the modern internet.

And I have to tell you, I’m taking this a lot more seriously than I was last week.

Bitcoin Holds $83K, but the Bigger Story Is AI and Cryptography

Bitcoin is holding around $83K to $84K this morning after testing $80,000 last week.

We didn’t break through $80K.

That’s good.

But I still think we’re going to test that level again, and I wouldn’t be surprised if we eventually break below it.

I don’t mean to be Mr. FUD here.

We’ve been watching this same trading channel for weeks. Bitcoin needs to break above $87K, establish something around $84K to $86K as support, and then start targeting $90K.

Until that happens, we’re still basically going sideways.

But Bitcoin’s price isn’t what I want to spend most of today discussing.

Over the weekend, I was listening to the All-In Podcast, as I usually do.

And to be perfectly honest, I’ve been tuning out a lot of their AI conversations lately.

It feels like they’ve been talking about nothing but AI for six months.

At some point, it all starts sounding repetitive.

But this weekend’s conversation was different.

David Friedberg was discussing a major collection of mathematical research released by OpenAI, and it connected directly to something we’ve been talking about here on Daily Crypto News.

Last week, we discussed Ethereum researcher Justin Drake’s warning that advances in artificial intelligence could eventually threaten the mathematics protecting cryptocurrency wallets.

At the time, I didn’t fully appreciate what was happening.

I thought a lot of the controversy was about mathematicians wanting recognition for their work and people arguing about whether AI should receive credit for solving mathematical problems.

That was part of the conversation.

But after listening to the discussion and digging into the underlying cryptography, I realized there was a much bigger question.

What happens if AI discovers new mathematics that makes supposedly impossible cryptographic problems much easier to solve?

And this isn’t just a Bitcoin problem.

This could affect Ethereum, banking, secure communications, authentication systems and enormous portions of the digital infrastructure we use every day.

OpenAI’s Mathematical Research Raises a New Security Question

On October 6th, OpenAI released a large collection of mathematical research generated by internal frontier AI models.

These are research systems beyond the models most people interact with publicly.

According to the figures discussed, the models were given approximately 4,000 open mathematical research problems.

The initial release included around 722 mathematical manuscripts, organized into 372 families of results.

The work covered subjects including number theory, algebra, geometry and theoretical computer science.

OpenAI also released machine-checkable formulations for many results using Lean, a system that allows mathematical proofs to be formally checked.

Think about that for a minute.

We’re talking about AI systems producing hundreds of mathematical research manuscripts that professional mathematicians are now evaluating.

And the models doing this work aren’t necessarily the same ones available to everybody using ChatGPT.

That opens up a completely different conversation about what frontier AI systems might already be capable of.

I’ve said before that I think artificial superintelligence could arrive much sooner than people expect. I even wonder whether some internal systems are already substantially more capable than the public realizes.

That’s speculation on my part.

But we’re sitting here arguing with ChatGPT about not using dashes while research models are producing mathematical work that has people in cryptography asking serious questions.

Now, here’s why this matters.

Modern cryptography depends on mathematical problems that are believed to be extraordinarily difficult to solve.

The security doesn’t necessarily come from the mathematics being secret.

It comes from the enormous difference between performing a calculation in one direction and reversing it.

And if AI discovers a new mathematical shortcut, some of those assumptions could change.

Why Bitcoin’s Private Keys Are So Difficult to Recover

Bitcoin and Ethereum both rely heavily on elliptic-curve cryptography.

The basic idea is relatively straightforward.

You have a private key, which is essentially a secret number.

Using that private key, your wallet can calculate a corresponding public key.

That’s easy.

But going backward is an entirely different problem.

Given a public key, calculating the private key is believed to be computationally infeasible using today’s conventional computers and known algorithms.

The underlying mathematical challenge is called the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem.

And for decades, mathematicians and cryptographers have studied these problems without discovering an efficient classical algorithm capable of solving them at the scale used by modern cryptocurrency systems.

That’s an important distinction.

We haven’t mathematically proven that no efficient algorithm could ever exist.

We simply haven’t found one.

And that’s where artificial intelligence enters the conversation.

AI doesn’t necessarily need to guess trillions upon trillions of private keys faster than a normal computer.

That isn’t the threat Justin Drake is describing.

The threat is that AI might discover a fundamentally better way to solve the mathematics.

Imagine that the best-known attack against a cryptographic system requires an impossibly enormous amount of computation.

Now imagine AI discovers a mathematical transformation that reduces that computational requirement by several orders of magnitude.

That’s different from building a faster computer.

You’ve changed the problem itself.

And if the improvement is significant enough, something previously considered impossible could potentially become practical.

Drake has warned that AI-driven mathematical discoveries could accelerate the timeline for these kinds of threats much faster than previously expected, potentially even into a matter of months in an extreme scenario.

Other cryptographers strongly disagree with that timeline.

And I think that’s important to acknowledge.

Nobody has demonstrated that AI can currently recover Bitcoin private keys from public keys.

Elliptic-curve cryptography has not been broken.

But the possibility of new mathematical discoveries is becoming a more serious subject of discussion.

And after spending the weekend looking into this, I understand why.

The AI Research Wasn’t Perfect

There’s another part of the OpenAI story worth discussing.

Not everything the models produced was correct.

On October 7th, OpenAI reportedly withdrew three manuscripts after a sign error invalidated part of a proof and two dependent results.

Another 14 manuscripts received corrections or repairs.

That’s important.

AI can produce sophisticated mathematical work and still make mistakes.

We shouldn’t automatically assume every generated proof is valid simply because a frontier model produced it.

But the errors don’t make the broader research meaningless.

The original release contained hundreds of manuscripts, and professional mathematicians were evaluating the results.

That’s still remarkable.

The important question isn’t whether AI is suddenly perfect at mathematics.

It’s whether AI is becoming capable of helping researchers discover things that would previously have taken substantially longer.

And if it can do that, we have to start thinking seriously about what happens when it turns its attention toward cryptography.

Three Ways AI Could Change Cryptocurrency Security

I think there are three broad possibilities.

Scenario One: Nothing catastrophic happens.

AI becomes an increasingly powerful mathematical research tool.

It helps mathematicians solve difficult problems, develops new proofs and improves existing algorithms.

But it never discovers an efficient way to break elliptic-curve cryptography.

Bitcoin and Ethereum continue using secure cryptographic systems, and the industry benefits from better research.

This is entirely possible.

Scenario Two: AI improves existing attacks without making them practical.

This is probably the more realistic concern.

Imagine that recovering a private key currently requires an absurdly enormous amount of computation.

AI discovers a mathematical improvement that makes an attack ten times faster.

Or a thousand times faster.

Or even a billion times faster.

That sounds terrifying.

But if the original problem would have required an unimaginably long period of computation, a billionfold improvement might still leave the attack completely impractical.

That’s something people need to understand.

A dramatic improvement in an algorithm does not automatically mean a cryptographic system has been broken.

The question is whether the improvement is large enough to make an actual attack feasible.

Scenario Three: AI discovers a fundamental mathematical shortcut.

This is the nightmare scenario.

Imagine an AI system discovers an efficient classical algorithm for solving the elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem.

If that happened, an attacker might be able to derive private keys from sufficiently exposed public keys without waiting for a powerful quantum computer.

That’s the scenario that could change everything.

And not just for cryptocurrency.

We’re talking about financial institutions, government systems, secure communications and digital authentication infrastructure.

Much of modern internet security relies on cryptographic assumptions that could be affected by a breakthrough of that magnitude.

Now, would the entire internet collapse overnight?

Not necessarily.

Different systems use different cryptographic algorithms, and many could migrate to alternatives.

But the transition could be enormously disruptive.

And if a single organization discovered such a vulnerability before anybody else, the implications could be extraordinary.

Which brings me to another thought I’ve been having.

What If the Most Powerful Weapon Isn’t Controlled by a Country?

We’ve spent generations thinking about national security in terms of countries.

Russia.

China.

Iran.

The United States.

Missiles, nuclear weapons, aircraft carriers, armies and all the other things countries build to defend themselves or project power.

But what happens if the most powerful technological capability on Earth is developed by a private company?

What if a company develops an AI system capable of exploiting critical digital infrastructure on a scale that governments cannot easily counter?

I’m not saying that’s happened.

I’m not saying Sam Altman or Dario Amodei is sitting in an office somewhere controlling the world’s banking systems.

But think about the implications.

Historically, a company trying to challenge a government would face enormous financial and military limitations.

Countries have armies.

Countries have resources.

Countries have the ability to mobilize entire economies.

But if a sufficiently advanced AI system became capable of exploiting critical infrastructure, the balance of power could look very different.

Maybe the future security threat isn’t always another country.

Maybe it’s a private organization controlling technology that nobody else understands or can effectively counter.

That’s a pretty wild thought.

And it’s one of the reasons I think we need to understand what frontier AI systems are actually capable of doing.

AI and Quantum Computing Are Two Different Threats

There’s another development that makes this conversation interesting.

Researchers participating in the Elliptic Curve Fail project recently worked on improving a component of a hypothetical quantum attack against elliptic-curve cryptography.

More than 100 participants reportedly worked alongside AI coding agents, producing improvements that reduced estimates for an important quantum-circuit component by more than 50% compared with an earlier benchmark.

That does not mean the total computing power needed to attack Bitcoin has suddenly been cut in half.

It means researchers found a substantial improvement in one component of the proposed attack.

But that’s still meaningful.

It demonstrates that the algorithms themselves can improve, not just the hardware.

And AI can help accelerate that process.

Here’s the distinction I think people need to understand.

Quantum computing: We already know a mathematical algorithm that could threaten elliptic-curve cryptography. It’s called Shor’s algorithm.

The problem is that we don’t yet have a sufficiently powerful, fault-tolerant quantum computer to execute that attack against the cryptographic keys used by Bitcoin and Ethereum.

We know the general mathematical approach.

We don’t have the necessary machine.

Artificial intelligence: We already have powerful computers capable of running advanced AI models.

What we don’t know is whether an efficient classical algorithm exists that could make recovering private keys practical.

AI might help researchers discover one.

Or it might never find one because no such useful shortcut exists.

That’s the difference.

With quantum computing, we know the algorithm and are waiting for sufficiently capable hardware.

With AI-assisted classical cryptanalysis, we have the hardware and are asking whether a radically better algorithm can be discovered.

And both possibilities deserve attention.

Why Some Bitcoin Wallets Could Be More Exposed Than Others

Let’s talk about what this could mean for people actually holding Bitcoin.

An attacker attempting to recover a private key through a hypothetical elliptic-curve attack would generally need access to the corresponding public key.

Depending on the address type and how a wallet has been used, Bitcoin can sometimes keep that public key hidden until coins are spent.

Once certain transactions reveal the public key, that information becomes available on the blockchain.

Ethereum has a similar distinction.

An ordinary Ethereum account that has never signed a transaction generally has not directly revealed its full public key onchain.

Once it begins signing transactions, the public key can be reconstructed from the signatures.

And that creates an interesting security consideration.

Justin Drake has suggested that large, sophisticated holders consider what he calls “bunker mode.”

The general idea is to minimize unnecessary public-key exposure and consider using fresh addresses whose relevant public keys haven’t previously been revealed.

Now, that isn’t a universal solution.

It doesn’t eliminate every possible cryptographic vulnerability.

And not every Bitcoin address format has the same exposure characteristics.

But it’s an example of how wallet design and operational security could matter if future attacks become more capable.

Vitalik Buterin has also taken a measured position.

He agrees that AI-accelerated mathematical research deserves serious consideration, but he has warned against people panicking and frantically moving their cryptocurrency.

And I agree with that.

Because moving cryptocurrency introduces risks of its own.

Anybody who has sent a substantial amount of Bitcoin knows exactly what I’m talking about.

You copy the address.

You double-check it.

Maybe you send a small test transaction first.

Then you send the larger amount.

And you sit there waiting for confirmation.

That moment between pressing send and seeing the transaction arrive is stressful as hell.

It doesn’t matter whether you’re sending $1,000, $10,000 or $10 million.

If you make a mistake, you may never get that money back.

So I’m not suggesting everybody immediately start moving their funds because of a hypothetical AI threat.

I’m saying the industry needs to take the research seriously and prepare appropriate solutions.

What Happens If Elliptic-Curve Cryptography Actually Breaks?

Bitcoin could theoretically migrate to a different signature system.

Ethereum could do the same.

But think about what that would involve.

Protocol changes.

Wallet software updates.

Hardware-wallet upgrades.

Exchange migrations.

Custodian migrations.

Users moving funds.

And potentially enormous amounts of cryptocurrency needing to be transferred into new security arrangements.

Then there are dormant wallets.

Lost Bitcoin.

Abandoned accounts.

People who haven’t touched their coins in ten years.

And, of course, Satoshi’s Bitcoin.

What happens to assets controlled by keys that might eventually become vulnerable but whose owners cannot or will not migrate them?

That’s a complicated problem.

It would require serious technical decisions, coordination and potentially contentious debates about how different blockchain networks should respond.

Which is another reason to think about these issues before there’s an emergency.

The Biggest AI Security Threat Might Still Be You

Here’s something else.

AI doesn’t actually need to break elliptic-curve cryptography to steal cryptocurrency.

It could become extremely good at finding software vulnerabilities.

Smart-contract bugs.

Wallet implementation errors.

Exchange security weaknesses.

Problems in applications that interact with blockchains.

Or vulnerabilities that have existed for years without anybody noticing.

And then there’s what I think might be the biggest weakness of all.

Human beings.

I’ve been spending a lot of time experimenting with AI-generated images and videos.

Over the weekend, I went down another rabbit hole looking at AI filmmaking tools, including Higgsfield.

The technology is getting unbelievably good.

We’re talking about AI-generated characters, voices, music, visual effects and entire cinematic sequences.

Some of this stuff is amazing.

But think about what that means for fraud.

Imagine receiving a video call that looks and sounds exactly like somebody you know.

Your mother.

Your brother.

Your spouse.

Your boss.

Imagine getting an email that perfectly imitates the writing style of somebody you trust.

Or a text message that seems completely authentic because the AI knows enough about your relationships and communication habits to make it convincing.

You don’t need to crack a Bitcoin private key if you can convince the owner to give you access.

You don’t need to break a blockchain if you can manipulate somebody into signing a malicious transaction.

And AI could make those attacks much more sophisticated.

That’s social engineering.

And we’ve been dealing with it for decades.

AI just gives attackers a much more powerful set of tools.

That’s why I think the conversation about AI and cryptocurrency security needs to go beyond whether a particular mathematical algorithm is vulnerable.

We have to consider the entire security environment.

The cryptography.

The software.

The wallets.

The exchanges.

And the people using them.

Because ultimately, the weakest point in the system might not be the mathematics.

It might be us.

Crypto Prices

All right, that was a lot.

This was supposed to be a relatively short podcast, and somehow I’ve spent almost half an hour talking about elliptic curves, quantum computers and AI potentially taking over the world.

Let’s get into prices.

Bitcoin is sitting around $83,350, up approximately 0.5% over 24 hours.

Ethereum is around $2,150, up approximately 2%.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is trading around $749, up approximately 0.3%.

XRP is approximately $1.40, up around 0.9%.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $111, up approximately 1.8%.

TRON is sitting around $0.331, up approximately 0.3%.

Zcash is around $1,300, up approximately 6%.

Hyperliquid is approximately $86.22, up around 1.4%.

Litecoin is around $64.82, up approximately 2.2%.

Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.83 trillion, up around 0.9%.

Fear & Greed Index: 57, Neutral.

My Take

I started last week thinking the discussion about AI breaking cryptography was mostly another round of speculation.

And I was wrong to dismiss it that quickly.

After listening to the All-In Podcast and digging further into the mathematics, I think this deserves a much more serious conversation.

Not because Bitcoin has been broken.

It hasn’t.

Not because AI has suddenly discovered how to recover private keys.

There’s no demonstrated evidence of that.

But because the entire security model depends on mathematical assumptions that researchers have spent decades studying.

And now we’re developing AI systems that can potentially accelerate mathematical research at an extraordinary rate.

That’s worth paying attention to.

I think the most important distinction is that AI doesn’t need to become infinitely powerful at brute-force computation.

It needs to discover better mathematics.

And if it does, the implications could extend far beyond Bitcoin.

We’re talking about modern digital infrastructure.

Banking.

Communications.

Government systems.

And enormous amounts of value protected by cryptographic keys.

The worst-case scenario is frightening, but it also isn’t inevitable.

Maybe AI never discovers a practical shortcut.

Maybe the research leads to better cryptography instead.

Maybe the industry uses these advances to strengthen security long before any serious threat emerges.

That’s what I hope happens.

And I think it’s why we should be encouraging this research rather than dismissing it as FUD.

There’s also a bigger conversation about who controls these increasingly powerful AI systems.

I find it fascinating that we’re developing technologies capable of performing advanced mathematical research while most people have very little visibility into what the most capable internal models can actually do.

I don’t know whether artificial superintelligence already exists somewhere behind closed doors.

I suspect the frontier of AI research is much further ahead than most people realize, but that’s my speculation.

What I do know is that the capabilities we’re seeing publicly are already extraordinary.

And we need to start thinking seriously about what happens when those capabilities affect critical infrastructure.

As for Bitcoin’s price, we’re still around $83K.

We held $80K last week, but I still think another test is possible.

We need to reclaim $87K and eventually start using the mid-$80,000 range as support before I’m going to get particularly excited about another run toward $90K.

For now, I’m watching the price, watching the AI research and trying to get a better understanding of where all this technology is going.

And I’m also going to try to get some sleep tonight.

This was supposed to be a short show.

It was not.

I’m still waiting for Craig Cobb to send over his market update, so you may get another Daily Crypto News episode this afternoon.

Have a great Monday.

Happy HODLing

Hey folks, I was out of sorts this weekend because I attended my first PSU White Out game. The tailgating was amazing and we spent all day in Happy Valley. Walked downtown and to the creamery before going back to visit several tailgating parties and then in for the big game. The energy was electric even though the overall mood was down since they are not ranked.

This was the beginning of the game and it eventually filled out and hit a record 114,000+. Welcome to my new Sunday series, hope you enjoy it.

🗺️ Where We Stand

Valley floor: ~$58,000 (June 2026 — the cycle bottom, confirmed)
You are here: ~$83,000 · +43% off the floor · this week: −2%
The summit: $126,198 (Oct 2025 ATH — 34% overhead)

🪜 The Ladder Overhead

🔹 $84–85K — 2026 buyers’ cost basis (supply wall) · +2% · next foothold
🔹 $87,570 — yearly open → green on the year · +5%
🔹 $100,000 — Std Chartered’s year-end target · +20%
🔹 $126,198 — the old summit · +52%

Clear $84–85K, where this year’s buyers are underwater, and trapped supply flips to fuel.

🧭 The Guides — This Week’s Report Card

This week’s $1B flush graded the voices in real time. How they’re aging:

✅ Called it — Peter Brandt flagged an early-October pullback weeks ahead (Sep 29); it landed on schedule. Eric Crown tagged September a “nothing month, then October moves” — read the rhythm right.

⏳ Holding firm — Standard Chartered reaffirmed $100K year-end through the flush (Oct 9); bold, unbroken, clock ticking. Matt Hougan’s “10-year grind up, not a moonshot” keeps fitting the chop better than the euphoric calls.

🔻 Looking early — Citi raised its target to $113K on Oct 2, days before the flush — right on the horizon, poorly timed for the week.

The read: nobody turned bearish — the real split is direction vs. timing, and this week timing won. Weight the guides who respect the path, not just the summit. Six weeks in, Brandt’s earned trust on timing, Hougan on framing, Saylor on simply doing what he says (he bought the dip again).

The Bottom Line

One week onto the climb, Bitcoin stumbled to $80,365 — and caught the ledge, whales adding ~15,000 BTC into the dip. A foothold, not a fall. Next is clearing $84–85K; CPI Wednesday is the weather. Base camp holds. We climb.

— The Inspirator ⚓

“In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.”
— Albert Einstein

🎵 Song of the Day: “Won’t Back Down” — Tom Petty — spare, defiant, standing your ground.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Friday Evening · CoinDesk + KuCoin + CryptoTicker)

🟧 BTC: $82,500 (+~1% · up ~3% off Thursday’s $80,365 low) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,490 (stabilizing after the 6× liquidation hit)
🌐 XRP: $1.42 (XRP ETFs the week’s lone inflow)
🟣 SOL: $116 (steadying)

The Hold: $80,365 held as the week’s low; BTC reclaimed $82K+ as Brent slipped to ~$103 and the war scare eased
The Conviction Call: Standard Chartered reaffirmed its $100,000 year-end target despite $729M of October ETF outflows — needs ~20% in 12 weeks
The Week: BTC ~−4% on the 7-day after a ~$1B+ liquidation flush; Fear & Greed cooled to 59
The Context: Q3 ran +43% ($58,566 → $83,576) — this week’s dip is a pullback within a strong quarter’s gains

Support: $80,365 (week low) → $80,000 (the line) → $78,000
Resistance: $83,398 (today’s high) → $84,432 → $87,000

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🎯 STANDARD CHARTERED HELD $100K THROUGH THE FLUSH. Per KuCoin: after a week that saw ~$1B in liquidations and $729M of October ETF outflows (BlackRock and Fidelity hit hardest), Standard Chartered’s Geoff Kendrick reaffirmed the bank’s $100,000 year-end target — a call requiring ~20% upside in 12 weeks. The significance for a Career & Education evening isn’t the number; it’s the timing. Anyone can hold a bullish target in a green week. Kendrick restated his in the middle of the worst stretch of the quarter, because his thesis rests on fundamentals the dip didn’t touch. Conviction reaffirmed in the red is worth ten targets issued in the green.

🛢️ THE WAR SCARE EASED — AND BTC BOUNCED. Per CryptoTicker: Brent slipped back to ~$103 as the Iran-strike fears that drove the week faded, and Bitcoin recovered ~3% off its $80,365 low to reclaim $82K+. It’s the clean confirmation of the week’s read: the drop was outside weather — oil, war headlines, yields — and as the external pressure eased, the asset floated back up. Nothing about Bitcoin broke this week; the macro storm blew in and is now blowing out. The $80K line took the full force and held, which is the quiet structural win under a red week.

💸 THE HONEST PICTURE — $729M OUT, BUT Q3 WAS +43%. Per KuCoin: October’s ETF outflows ($729M) are real and worth respecting — near-term demand genuinely cooled. But zoom out: Q3 ran from $58,566 to $83,576, a ~43% gain, and this week’s pullback sits inside those gains, not below them. The flows ebb and flow; the quarter’s trend is intact. A down week after a +43% quarter is the market breathing, not the thesis breaking — exactly the frame the long-horizon voices (and today’s Standard Chartered call) keep pointing to.

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
A week of $1B liquidations and ETF outflows is a reminder that the long-horizon holders — the ones who hold through the red — don’t leave their stack exposed. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no single party can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Hold with conviction; secure with no single point of failure.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

🌅 THE FRIDAY THOUGHT — CAREER & EDUCATION (PM EDITION)

Conviction Is What You Hold In The Red

It’s easy to tell who believed in something when everything was going up. The real test came this week: a billion-dollar flush, four red days, money flowing out — and Standard Chartered reaffirmed its $100K target anyway. That’s the difference between an opinion and a conviction. An opinion is what you hold when it’s easy. A conviction is what you hold when it costs you something to keep holding it.

Every career tests this. You’ll declare a belief — in a strategy, a project, a direction, yourself — while conditions are favorable, and it feels like conviction. Then the hard stretch comes: the results dip, the doubters pile on, the evidence seems to turn against you. That’s the moment that reveals what you actually had. If the belief evaporates the instant it stops being rewarded, it was never conviction — it was just optimism riding a good trend. Real conviction is anchored to reasons, not to results, so it can hold through a stretch where the results temporarily contradict it. The professional checks: did my thesis actually break, or just my price? If only the price moved, you hold.

The green days tell you nothing about what you believe. The red days tell you everything. Hold the conviction that’s anchored to reasons; drop the opinion that was only riding the trend.

🎯 Opinion holds when it’s easy; conviction holds when it costs.
🔍 Anchor belief to reasons, not results — so it survives a bad stretch.
⚓ Ask: did my thesis break, or just my price?

Standard Chartered held $100K in the red. The red week is where you find out what you actually believe. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Which of your beliefs — about a plan, a path, yourself — is being tested by a “red stretch” right now, and is it anchored to reasons that still hold, or was it just optimism riding a good trend?

One challenge this weekend: Take the conviction currently under pressure and separate the two: has the thesis actually broken, or just the short-term results? If the reasons still stand, write them down and hold — deliberately, because it’s hard right now. Conviction you only keep when it’s easy was never conviction.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Friday, October 9th, 2026. My name is Matt.

Go Guards!

The Cleveland Guardians won yesterday, and we’re heading to Game 5 of the ALDS.

But we’re not here to talk about baseball. We’re here to talk about Bitcoin, which just survived another major test of $80,000.

And when I say survived, I mean Bitcoin bounced.

I don’t necessarily mean it recovered.

There’s a difference.

We’ve been watching Bitcoin trade between roughly $82K and $87K for weeks. The goal was to break above $87K, move toward $89K to $90K, and eventually establish that higher range as support.

And when I talk about support and resistance, I’m not talking about some thin piece of paper sitting exactly at $90,000.

I think of it more like a sheet of ice covering water. You have to break through that entire resistance zone, which might run from $89K to $90K, and then establish that area as the new floor.

That’s what we wanted.

Instead, Bitcoin broke below $82K and tested $80K.

And that changes things.

I’m starting to think we’re entering a different trading range, potentially somewhere between $74K and $80K, unless Bitcoin can stage a more convincing recovery.

I don’t think we’re out of the woods.

And frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if we see Bitcoin trading in the $70,000s relatively soon.

$1.2 Billion in Crypto Liquidations as Oil and Iran Drive the Market

The big story yesterday was the liquidation cascade.

Approximately $1.2 billion in leveraged crypto positions was liquidated over 24 hours, with more than $1 billion reportedly coming from long positions.

Here’s how some of that broke down:

• Ethereum: approximately $356 million in liquidations.

• Bitcoin: approximately $298 million.

• Solana: approximately $71 million.

• XRP: approximately $34 million.

Ethereum got absolutely slammed.

And this is what happens when too much leverage builds up in the system.

People are betting that Bitcoin and the broader crypto market will continue moving higher. Then something changes in the macro environment, prices start dropping, leveraged positions get liquidated, and those liquidations create even more selling pressure.

Suddenly, a relatively normal move becomes a much larger one.

Listener Obsidian Enoch wrote in with an observation that I think is pretty accurate.

He said this pullback feels more like macroeconomic pressure than anything specific to cryptocurrency. Leverage is getting flushed out, while oil prices, Treasury yields and the dollar are driving risk assets.

I agree with him.

Enoch, you’re getting a shout-out today.

Because that’s exactly what I’m watching.

The macroeconomic pressure chain looks something like this:

Iran escalation leads to higher oil prices, which increases inflation concerns, pushes Treasury yields higher, raises expectations for Federal Reserve tightening and puts pressure on Bitcoin and other risk assets.

That’s the problem.

Brent crude is still trading above $100 a barrel, although it fell more than 1% Friday morning.

The reported catalyst for Bitcoin’s rebound was President Trump’s comments suggesting the United States would not launch strikes against Iran before the midterm elections.

That’s how the rebound is being explained in the news.

But I have some serious questions about that.

First of all, why would military decisions be based on an election calendar?

If American personnel are being attacked and there’s a legitimate military objective, then what exactly are we waiting for?

Either there’s business to handle or there isn’t.

If there isn’t, then get out of there.

If there is, then make the decision based on the actual circumstances, not whether an election is coming up.

What worries me is the possibility that we’re simply delaying a much larger confrontation until after the midterms.

And if that happens, oil could become an even bigger problem.

I don’t know what’s going to happen.

But I do know that geopolitical uncertainty is having a substantial impact on financial markets right now.

Bitcoin’s New Support and Resistance Levels

The immediate question is whether $80K can become a reliable floor.

I’m not necessarily concerned about Bitcoin briefly trading at $79K or $79,500. I look at support as a range, not one exact number.

For me, the important area is approximately $79K to $81K.

If Bitcoin can stabilize there, then we need to start reclaiming the $83K to $84K area.

That would be the first sign that buyers are beginning to regain control.

But right now, I think we’re in a downtrend.

And if I were taking a bet, I’d be looking for Bitcoin to spend some time in the $70,000s.

Possibly lower, depending on what happens after the midterm elections.

The other problem is that institutional money has started moving out.

Bitcoin ETFs experienced another day of outflows Thursday, following nearly half a billion dollars in withdrawals Wednesday.

Together, that represents roughly three-quarters of a billion dollars leaving Bitcoin ETFs over two sessions.

That’s not encouraging.

And it makes a sustained recovery much more difficult when the broader macro environment is already working against us.

MARA Moves Bitcoin as Mining Companies Pivot Toward AI

Let’s get into some institutional and corporate news.

Bitcoin miner MARA transferred approximately $81 million worth of Bitcoin, nearly 1,000 BTC, to addresses associated with Galaxy Digital.

Now, that doesn’t necessarily mean MARA sold those coins.

Moving Bitcoin between wallets or transferring it to a financial services company is not confirmation of a sale.

But it is worth watching because MARA’s Bitcoin treasury has reportedly been shrinking.

The company held approximately 53,000 BTC in February, compared with around 35,000 by August.

And honestly, that’s part of the Bitcoin mining business.

Mining companies have enormous infrastructure costs.

They have machines.

They have electricity bills.

They have facilities.

They have employees.

And when Bitcoin’s price falls while mining difficulty remains high, their economics can deteriorate pretty quickly.

They’re still paying to operate all that equipment, but the Bitcoin they’re earning is worth less.

So what happens?

They sell some of their Bitcoin reserves to cover operating costs.

They shut down less efficient machines.

They reduce spending.

They try to survive until the market improves.

That’s the cycle.

And this is why the growing relationship between Bitcoin mining and artificial intelligence is so interesting.

Mining companies already have access to power infrastructure, data centers and computing facilities.

Some are now looking at ways to use that infrastructure for AI and high-performance computing.

The economics aren’t identical, and converting mining facilities into AI data centers isn’t necessarily simple or cheap.

But the opportunity is there.

Instead of depending almost entirely on Bitcoin mining profitability, these companies could potentially develop additional revenue streams from AI infrastructure.

And that could help smooth out some of the enormous volatility in the mining business.

Bitcoin mining has always been cyclical.

You make money during the good times, and then you spend the bad times trying not to bleed out.

If AI can help some of these companies generate revenue throughout the cycle, that’s a significant development.

Robinhood and T. Rowe Price Explore Tokenized ETFs

Robinhood is also exploring a tokenized version of an actively managed ETF with T. Rowe Price.

T. Rowe Price is one of the largest traditional asset managers in the world, with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets under management.

The proposed product would be represented as a stock token on Robinhood’s blockchain infrastructure.

This is another example of tokenization moving deeper into traditional finance.

We’ve already discussed tokenized Treasuries, public stocks, private-market exposure and cash-management funds.

Now we’re talking about actively managed investment products.

The bigger picture is that more traditional financial assets are being considered for blockchain-based issuance, ownership records and trading.

Thailand Approves Local Crypto ETFs as the UK Targets Sanctions Evasion

Thailand’s securities regulators have approved a framework allowing domestic asset managers to launch locally listed Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

The new rules are scheduled to take effect on October 16th.

That’s another market opening up regulated access to crypto investment products.

And I thought Thailand already had something like this, but apparently this is the new framework for locally listed products.

Meanwhile, the British government has imposed sanctions on three cryptocurrency exchanges and two payment-service centers accused of helping facilitate Russian sanctions evasion.

Two of the services reportedly handled transactions connected to the Kremlin-backed A7 financial network.

The sanctions reflect the continuing effort by Western governments to target financial infrastructure they believe is being used to move money around existing restrictions.

And that’s going to remain a major regulatory and enforcement issue for cryptocurrency, particularly as stablecoins and international payment networks become more widely used.

Vitalik Buterin Responds to the AI Cryptography Debate

Now let’s get back to one of the most interesting technology discussions we’ve had this week.

Yesterday, we talked about Ethereum researcher Justin Drake warning that advances in artificial intelligence and mathematics could eventually create new threats to the cryptography securing Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies.

His argument wasn’t that these systems have already been broken.

They haven’t.

His concern was that improvements in AI-assisted mathematical research could justify preparing earlier than previously expected for potential vulnerabilities.

And now Vitalik Buterin has weighed in with a more measured position.

Essentially, don’t panic, but take the issue seriously.

And that’s exactly what I was saying yesterday.

Have the conversation.

Don’t dismiss the entire subject as FUD simply because somebody raised a concern about the security of existing cryptographic systems.

We’re talking about an enormous amount of money secured by these technologies.

Individuals.

Companies.

Institutions.

Governments.

If there is even a plausible risk that future advances in computing could threaten the cryptography protecting those assets, we should investigate it.

That doesn’t mean AI can currently recover Bitcoin private keys from public keys. There is no demonstrated capability to do that.

But it does mean researchers should continue evaluating the assumptions underlying these systems.

And I think there’s a larger discussion here about how people react to AI breakthroughs.

We’ve seen stories about AI systems helping solve difficult mathematical and scientific problems.

And whenever that happens, there’s often a debate about whether the AI deserves credit or whether the scientists whose work trained the system deserve the recognition.

Look, I understand the importance of acknowledging people’s contributions.

But if I learned mathematics from a teacher, who learned from another teacher, who learned from another teacher, and then I went out and solved a mathematical problem nobody had solved before, I would still be the one who solved it.

Of course, I might thank my teachers.

But the breakthrough still happened.

And that’s the part I think people are missing when it comes to AI.

The important thing is what these systems might allow us to accomplish.

We’re talking about potential breakthroughs in genetics, medicine, cancer research, longevity and other scientific fields.

Imagine what could happen if we put a serious, coordinated effort into using AI to solve some of those problems.

Instead, we spend an enormous amount of time arguing about whether AI should be allowed to do certain things, whether it received proper attribution and whether we should slow everything down.

I understand there are legitimate ethical concerns.

But I also think we’re overlooking the potential benefits.

Can we use these systems to help cure cancer?

Can we use them to accelerate scientific discoveries?

Can we figure out problems that have been sitting in front of humanity for generations?

That would be nice.

And no, before anybody takes me seriously, I don’t actually have evidence that Claude has secretly cured cancer and Anthropic is waiting until its IPO to announce it.

That’s a joke.

But it gets at my broader point.

AI is becoming an incredibly powerful tool.

Let’s use it.

And when it comes to cryptocurrency security, let’s make sure we’re taking advantage of those capabilities to strengthen our systems rather than pretending potential risks don’t exist.

Solana Targets Faster Blocks as XRP Ledger Expands Account Permissions

Solana is moving toward another performance improvement.

The network is completing a multistage upgrade intended to reduce its target block time from approximately 400 milliseconds to 200 milliseconds.

That’s essentially cutting the target time in half.

The final change is scheduled for approximately 3 p.m. UTC.

If successfully implemented, the improvement could help reduce the time between blocks and further improve the network’s responsiveness.

The XRP Ledger also activated an upgrade called Permission Delegation v1.1 on Thursday.

This is a particularly interesting development for institutional custody and financial operations.

The upgrade allows an account owner to authorize separate accounts to perform specific functions without giving those accounts unrestricted control over the primary account’s private keys.

Think about how a normal company operates.

You don’t give every employee access to every bank account.

You don’t give everybody the ability to move every dollar the company owns.

You have different permission levels.

Some employees can initiate payments.

Others can approve them.

Some can access records.

Others can manage compliance.

The same basic concept applies here.

A company using the XRP Ledger could potentially separate payment operations, compliance responsibilities and treasury control.

The primary account’s keys could remain secured while other authorized accounts perform limited functions.

And that makes sense.

I’ve talked about how blockchain infrastructure needs to accommodate the way institutions actually operate.

Banks and corporations don’t function by giving every employee unrestricted access to everything.

They use permissions.

They use controls.

They separate responsibilities.

And crypto infrastructure increasingly needs to support those same operational requirements.

That’s a legitimate problem being addressed.

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin is sitting around $83,000, up approximately 1% over 24 hours, but down roughly 4.2% over seven days.

Ethereum is having a rough week, trading around $2,496, down nearly 10% over seven days.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is around $741, down approximately 2.5%.

XRP is sitting around $1.38, essentially flat over the past 24 hours.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $110, down approximately 2.1%.

TRON is approximately $0.332, down around 0.6%.

Hyperliquid is trading around $85.63, up approximately 0.5%.

Zcash is around $1,223, up approximately 1.8% over 24 hours, but still down around 11% for the week.

And that weekly performance is really the story.

Bitcoin is down more than 4%.

Ethereum is down nearly 10%.

Uniswap is down approximately 18%.

The CoinMarketCap 20 Index is down around 5.5%.

A lot of the altcoin market is showing double-digit weekly losses.

We’re having a rough week.

And I don’t necessarily think it’s over.

My Take

I think we’re entering a more difficult period for Bitcoin.

Yesterday’s move back above $80K was encouraging, but I’m calling it a bounce, not a recovery.

We lost the $82K to $83K support area that had held for weeks.

We saw approximately $1.2 billion in liquidations.

ETF investors have been pulling money out.

Oil remains above $100.

And geopolitical uncertainty is creating a lot of additional pressure.

That’s not an environment where I’m particularly confident we’re about to break through $90K.

I think we could see Bitcoin around $74K to $75K as we approach the midterm elections.

And depending on the election results and what happens geopolitically afterward, I wouldn’t rule out lower prices.

Now, here’s where I think politics could become a significant factor.

My prediction is that Democrats win the House but not the Senate.

And I think the market will be able to digest that outcome.

But if Democrats win both chambers, I think there’s a possibility that crypto markets react negatively.

Not necessarily because Democrats are inherently bad for crypto.

It’s because I expect congressional investigations and political pressure surrounding President Trump, World Liberty Financial and the administration’s relationship with the cryptocurrency industry.

I think Democrats would focus heavily on Trump and his crypto-related businesses.

And in the process, there’s a possibility that broader crypto legislation, regulation and companies become caught up in those political fights.

That’s what concerns me.

Even if the primary target is Trump, the collateral damage could extend to the rest of the industry.

If markets begin pricing in that possibility ahead of the election, I could see additional selling pressure.

And in a particularly negative scenario, I wouldn’t rule out Bitcoin moving into the $60,000s or even $50,000s.

That’s not my base-case forecast. It’s a risk scenario based on how I think the political and regulatory environment could develop.

On the other hand, if Republicans retain control of both chambers, I think markets could respond more positively because the immediate risk of congressional confrontation over the administration’s crypto policies would be reduced.

That doesn’t mean Bitcoin automatically goes up.

We’d still have oil.

We’d still have Iran.

We’d still have Treasury yields, inflation and Federal Reserve policy.

Those factors don’t disappear because one party wins an election.

But I think the market would have one less major political uncertainty to price in.

Again, my prediction is Democrats take the House but not the Senate.

We’ll see what happens.

For now, I’m watching $80K as the immediate support zone and $83K to $84K as the first area Bitcoin needs to reclaim.

If that doesn’t happen, I think we need to start taking the possibility of another leg lower much more seriously.

Have a great Friday.

Happy HODLing

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Thursday, October 8th, 2026. My name is Matt.

Before we get into the news, I want to give a couple of shout-outs.

Sparky831 wrote in and said that I’m part of his daily routine and that I’m the bee’s knees. He’s been listening for years. Thank you very much. I appreciate that.

Sergio Smith also left a review on Apple Podcasts calling this the best crypto news ever. Very funny, Sergio. Thank you.

I really appreciate everybody who takes the time to leave reviews or comments. I don’t check every podcast app because there are so many of them, but I do check Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

And speaking of Spotify, I got a listener question yesterday that sent me down a little bit of a rabbit hole.

The question was whether personalized, locally hosted large language models could solve my concerns about AI and free speech.

And my answer is no.

Here’s why.

AI, Free Speech and Who Gets to Control What We Say

I understand that you can run an LLM locally on your own computer. You can write whatever you want in your house. You can type something into a document, put pen to paper, or build your own AI system that operates entirely offline.

That’s not the issue.

The issue is what happens when you take those ideas into the public square.

Free speech doesn’t mean very much if the only place you’re allowed to exercise it is inside your own house.

What concerns me is the growing role that AI companies and social media platforms play in determining which ideas can be expressed, distributed or amplified.

When you’re using a public-facing AI tool and it starts arguing with you about whether you’re allowed to express a particular opinion, or when a platform throttles your content because it disagrees with your position, that’s where I have a problem.

Now we’re talking about private companies and their algorithms becoming arbiters of truth.

And who decides what the truth is?

Think about COVID.

We had enormous public debates about masks, social distancing, restaurant closures and government restrictions. Some of those debates are still happening six years later.

People disagreed about what worked, what didn’t work and what governments should have done.

That’s fine.

The problem comes when platforms decide that certain positions cannot be expressed or distributed because they conflict with whatever the prevailing institutional position happens to be.

We saw significant content moderation and restrictions on platforms such as Twitter, YouTube and Facebook during that period.

Some of those decisions involved legitimate attempts to limit harmful misinformation. Others became controversial because they restricted discussion of questions that were still evolving.

And my argument is that people should be allowed to have those conversations.

That doesn’t mean every opinion is correct.

It doesn’t mean every claim deserves to be believed.

It means people should be able to express their views and debate them publicly.

Now we’re bringing AI into that same environment.

And I worry that we’re creating systems that don’t simply help us write, research and communicate. They also influence which ideas get presented, how those ideas are framed and which conclusions users are encouraged to accept.

I think users should have much greater control over those systems.

You should be able to control your own algorithms.

Not Mark Zuckerberg.

Not Elon Musk.

Not Dario Amodei.

If you don’t want to see certain content, you should be able to make that choice. If you want a particular kind of information in your feed, you should be able to configure that too.

And this goes into something else I’ve written about before.

I don’t think we have nearly as many original thoughts as we believe we do.

We’re all consuming enormous amounts of the same information. We’re watching trends develop, seeing the same stories circulate and being influenced by the same cultural conversations.

Sometimes I have an idea weeks or months before it becomes a much larger public discussion.

That’s not because I’m some kind of genius.

It’s because I’m online constantly, paying attention to trends and seeing things develop before they become mainstream.

Eventually everybody else starts seeing the same information, and the conversation moves in that direction.

In that sense, our thoughts are constantly being influenced by the information environment around us.

That’s why I think control over algorithms and AI systems matters so much.

And that’s why simply telling people to run a local LLM doesn’t answer my concern.

I know I can think whatever I want inside my house.

I want people to have the ability to express those thoughts publicly.

That’s my opinion.

Debate me.

Anyway, that was a six-minute rant I didn’t expect to get into this morning.

Let’s talk crypto.

Bitcoin Loses $83K as Treasury Yields, Oil and ETF Outflows Pressure the Market

Bitcoin is sitting around $82,000, having fallen below the $83K level we were watching yesterday.

And naturally, everybody is now talking about $80K.

Could we go there?

Absolutely.

But I’m not convinced we’re automatically headed there just because Bitcoin slipped below $83K.

We’ve been trading inside this broader channel between roughly $82K and $87K for weeks.

So while losing $83K isn’t encouraging, we’re still near the lower end of the range we’ve been discussing.

The bigger issue is the macro environment.

Brent crude is back above $100 a barrel.

The 10-year Treasury yield is around 5.34%.

The 30-year is approximately 5.69%.

And the U.S. dollar is climbing toward an 18-month high.

Those are significant headwinds for Bitcoin.

Higher oil prices contribute to inflation concerns. Elevated Treasury yields make bonds more attractive relative to speculative assets. A stronger dollar can also create pressure on dollar-denominated risk assets.

And all of that is happening while Bitcoin is struggling to establish a sustained breakout.

Yesterday’s Federal Reserve minutes didn’t exactly make the situation better.

The September meeting minutes showed that policymakers remain concerned about persistent inflation.

The Fed raised rates by 25 basis points last month, and most policymakers still see another increase as potentially appropriate before the end of the year.

The question is timing.

Markets are expecting the Fed to pause at its October 27–28 meeting.

I don’t necessarily agree.

I’ve been saying this for a while now.

If the goal is to slow demand and bring inflation under control, why not continue tightening while the economy is still relatively strong?

I would seriously consider another 25-basis-point hike in October.

Then you have the holiday spending period to evaluate what happens.

Halloween.

Thanksgiving.

Christmas.

You can watch consumer spending, inflation and employment data and then decide what to do in December.

Now, the market is pricing a pause, and the market is probably right more often than I am.

But I don’t understand why the Fed would necessarily stop now.

And Bitcoin ETF investors certainly aren’t acting particularly optimistic.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw approximately $487 million in net outflows Wednesday.

That’s nearly half a billion dollars leaving the funds in a single session.

We’ve had some substantial inflows over the past few weeks, but that’s still a significant reversal.

The stronger dollar is also creating an interesting situation outside crypto.

I was looking at the dollar against the Japanese yen this morning.

I’ve traveled to Japan many times, and I remember exchange rates around 80, 90, 100 and 120 yen per dollar.

Now we’re talking about roughly 160 yen to the dollar.

If you’re an American traveling to Japan, that’s an enormous difference in purchasing power compared with some of those earlier trips.

Obviously, local prices matter too, but the exchange rate is attractive.

Maybe it’s time for another trip to Japan.

Standard Chartered Expands Crypto Custody as Samsung Brings USDC to Millions of Phones

Let’s get into some institutional and corporate developments.

Standard Chartered announced plans to expand its digital-asset custody services into Singapore.

The bank’s Singapore operations intend to provide institutional custody for selected cryptocurrencies, stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets, subject to regulatory requirements.

This expands the bank’s existing digital-asset custody footprint, which already includes operations in the UAE, Luxembourg and Hong Kong.

And we’re seeing the same pattern we’ve been discussing for months.

Traditional financial institutions are continuing to build crypto infrastructure.

They’re not necessarily buying Bitcoin and hoping the price goes up.

They’re building custody systems, payment networks and infrastructure for tokenized financial products.

That matters because institutions need regulated services before they can move substantial amounts of capital into these markets.

But the bigger consumer adoption story today might be Samsung.

Samsung is bringing USDC stablecoin transfers directly into Samsung Wallet.

Beginning in the final week of October, eligible Galaxy users in the United States will be able to send USDC through Samsung Wallet using blockchain infrastructure that includes Solana.

The service will support transfers to eligible bank accounts in more than 60 countries, with integrated fiat on-ramps and off-ramps.

Samsung estimates that approximately 82 million Galaxy devices in the United States could eventually support the functionality.

Think about that.

We’re talking about bringing stablecoin payments directly into an application that millions of people already use.

You don’t necessarily need to download a separate crypto wallet, figure out which exchange to use or understand how blockchain settlement works.

You open Samsung Wallet and send money.

The blockchain handles the infrastructure behind the scenes.

That’s a very different kind of crypto adoption than what we’ve seen historically.

And I think it’s important.

Crypto ETFs Are Moving Beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum

We’re also seeing the digital-asset ETF market expand.

Grayscale says the SEC’s broader listing standards are creating pathways for additional cryptocurrency investment products.

One interesting example is the Grayscale Zcash ETF.

And I find that fascinating because Zcash is a privacy-focused cryptocurrency.

We’ve spent years debating how regulators would approach privacy coins, and now we’re seeing traditional financial products providing exposure to them.

The broader regulatory framework could support ETFs tied to approximately 15 different crypto assets.

And that got me thinking about Litecoin.

I actually had to stop and look up whether we already had a Litecoin ETF.

We do.

The Canary Litecoin ETF launched in October 2025.

But Litecoin is interesting to me for another reason.

I’ve always looked at Litecoin as a potential indicator of retail speculation.

It’s an older cryptocurrency.

It’s recognizable.

And compared with Bitcoin, the price of an individual Litecoin looks inexpensive.

Now, obviously, the price of one coin doesn’t tell you whether an asset is cheap or expensive. Market capitalization and supply matter.

But retail investors don’t always think that way.

Somebody comes into crypto, sees Bitcoin at $82,000 and thinks, “That’s expensive.”

Then they see Litecoin around $60 or $80 and think, “Well, that’s a lot cheaper.”

And they start buying Litecoin.

I’ve seen that mentality before.

That’s why I watch Litecoin.

If we suddenly see Litecoin running toward $200, $300 or $400 because new retail money is flooding into the market, I’m going to start wondering whether we’re approaching the speculative top of the cycle.

That’s not a prediction.

It’s just one of the indicators I personally watch.

Could AI Eventually Break Bitcoin’s Cryptography?

Now we get into what I think is the most fascinating technology story of the day.

Ethereum researcher Justin Drake is raising concerns about whether advances in artificial intelligence, mathematics and computing could eventually threaten the cryptography protecting cryptocurrency wallets.

Drake has suggested that the industry should begin preparing for what he calls “bunker mode.”

The concern involves elliptic-curve digital signatures, including ECDSA, which is used in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency systems.

Let’s be very clear.

Nobody is saying that Bitcoin’s cryptography has already been broken.

There is no demonstrated AI system that can simply take a Bitcoin public key and recover its private key.

But Drake’s argument is that improvements in AI-assisted mathematical research and computing could justify preparing earlier than previously expected for a potential breakthrough.

One precaution he has discussed is moving funds, particularly large holdings, into fresh addresses that have never signed a transaction and therefore have not directly exposed their public keys.

That isn’t a complete solution to every possible future cryptographic threat, but it could reduce exposure to certain types of attacks.

And the response from the crypto industry has been mixed.

Cryptographer Yehuda Lindell has criticized the warning as FUD.

Dragonfly’s Haseeb Qureshi has characterized it as a serious warning worth considering.

And I’m much closer to that second position.

I hate when somebody raises a legitimate security concern and the immediate response is, “That’s FUD.”

Why?

Because it might not be.

We’ve seen artificial intelligence make enormous progress in mathematical research and scientific problem-solving.

That doesn’t mean AI is about to break Bitcoin tomorrow.

It doesn’t even establish that AI will be able to break the relevant cryptographic assumptions without a major breakthrough in computing.

But if researchers are identifying plausible risks, shouldn’t we at least investigate them?

We’re talking about hundreds of billions of dollars in cryptocurrency assets.

We’re talking about individuals, companies, institutions and governments.

This isn’t something you casually dismiss.

And I don’t think taking security seriously means everybody needs to panic.

There’s a difference between reasonable precautions and going completely overboard.

I’ve seen parents put helmets, knee pads and elbow pads on their kids just to go play on a playground.

And I’m sorry, but I think that’s a little crazy.

Let the kid play.

But if you see a three-year-old swinging dangerously high, with the chains going slack and other kids running underneath the swing, you’re probably going to intervene.

That’s not being paranoid.

That’s recognizing an actual risk.

And that’s how I look at this cryptography debate.

Don’t put Bitcoin in a giant protective bubble because somebody came up with a hypothetical scenario.

But don’t dismiss serious security research simply because the implications make you uncomfortable.

Investigate it.

Test it.

Develop better protections.

If the current cryptography remains secure, fantastic.

If there’s a meaningful weakness emerging, I’d rather we discover it and prepare before somebody figures out how to exploit it.

That’s not FUD.

That’s responsible security engineering.

Solana DeFi Expands Into AI, Robotics and Infrastructure Financing

One more interesting story before prices.

Solana-based decentralized exchange Orca and lending protocol Loopscale are merging into a new organization called Formation.

The combined business will bring together Orca’s trading and liquidity infrastructure with Loopscale’s lending and investment-vault capabilities.

The goal is to develop financing infrastructure for emerging industries, including artificial intelligence, robotics, energy and defense.

Orca has processed more than $500 billion in trading volume since 2021.

Loopscale reports more than $150 million in deposits and over $2 billion in facilitated loans.

The interesting part is where they’re trying to take that infrastructure.

We’re moving beyond decentralized exchanges that simply allow people to swap tokens.

They’re talking about using onchain liquidity and lending markets to help finance businesses operating in some of the most capital-intensive industries in the world.

Whether that actually develops into a major financing market remains to be seen.

But it’s another example of DeFi companies trying to build financial services that extend beyond cryptocurrency speculation.

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin is sitting around $82,411, down approximately 1.4% over 24 hours.

Ethereum is around $2,540, down approximately 1.3%.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is approximately $762, down around 0.4%.

XRP is around $1.40, down approximately 3%.

Solana is sitting around $113, down roughly 3.2%.

TRON is approximately $0.335, up around 0.6%. It feels like TRON is always sitting around 33.5 cents, whether it’s up or down.

Hyperliquid is around $85.84, down approximately 3.75%.

Zcash continues getting hammered, trading around $1,207, down approximately 6.75% over 24 hours and 13.5% over seven days.

Litecoin is around $64.22, down approximately 4%.

Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.8 trillion, down around 1.3%.

Fear & Greed Index: 58, Neutral.

My Take

There are two things I’m thinking about today.

The first is Bitcoin.

We’re sitting around $82K again, and the macro environment is not doing us any favors.

Oil is above $100.

Treasury yields remain extremely high.

The dollar is strengthening.

And nearly half a billion dollars just came out of Bitcoin ETFs.

That’s not exactly the environment you want when you’re trying to break through $87K and establish a new floor.

I still think we’re broadly in the same trading channel we’ve been discussing for weeks, but $80K is becoming a much more relevant level to watch.

If we lose the lower end of this range and can’t recover it, then we have to start reconsidering where Bitcoin goes next.

The second thing is the AI cryptography debate.

I think Justin Drake is raising an issue that deserves serious consideration.

That doesn’t mean I believe Bitcoin is about to be hacked.

It doesn’t mean people should panic and start moving funds around without understanding what they’re doing.

It means that if researchers believe advances in mathematics or computing could eventually threaten existing cryptographic systems, we should take that possibility seriously.

We have an enormous amount of value secured by these systems.

And we have an industry that prides itself on being technologically sophisticated.

So let’s be sophisticated about it.

Let’s study the risks, improve the cryptography where necessary and make sure we’re not ignoring legitimate concerns simply because somebody labeled them FUD.

Meanwhile, traditional financial adoption keeps moving.

Samsung is putting stablecoin transfers into millions of phones.

Standard Chartered is expanding institutional crypto custody.

And Solana DeFi companies are trying to build financing infrastructure for AI, robotics and other emerging industries.

That’s all happening while Bitcoin struggles around $82K.

And I think that’s worth remembering.

The price can go sideways or down while the technology and infrastructure continue developing.

Also, I got eight hours of sleep last night because I forgot to set my alarm.

I woke up an hour later than I was supposed to, and I feel fantastic.

Which apparently means I have enough energy to rant about free speech, artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency security and parents putting helmets on their kids at playgrounds.

You’re welcome.

Have a great Thursday.

Happy HODLing

“The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.”
— Rumi

🎵 Song of the Day: “The Sound of Silence” — Simon & Garfunkel — spare, searching, the one voice still listening in a quiet room.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Wednesday Evening · Yahoo + CoinDesk + CryptoTimes)

🟧 BTC: $83,500 (-2.8% · fifth $87K rejection + $546M flush, held above $83K) ⚠️
🔵 ETH: $2,580 (-4.9% · led the downside) ⚠️
🌐 XRP: $1.45 (-4%)
🟣 SOL: $117.75 (-2.7%)

The Minutes: most Fed officials backed another 2026 rate hike — split between “precautionary” and “start of a tightening cycle”
The Tell (per Yahoo): stocks and gold barely moved on the release — Bitcoin was the only market that reacted
The Day: $546M liquidated, oil up on Iranian tanker attacks, 10-yr yields near 2002 highs — a macro risk-off
The Structure: still inside range; $80K the line that must hold, $83,300 the near pivot

Support: $83,300 → $82,000 → $80,000 (critical) → $78,000
Resistance: $85,000 → $87,000 (5th rejection) → $90,000

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🎧 BITCOIN WAS THE ONLY MARKET THAT REACTED. Per Yahoo Finance: the September FOMC minutes revealed most officials expect another rate hike in 2026 — and here’s the fascinating part: US stocks and gold barely moved, but Bitcoin was the exception, flinching immediately on the release. Why does the most “speculative” asset react most sharply to a Fed signal? Because Bitcoin is the market most purely sensitive to the price of money and liquidity — it has no earnings, no dividends, no story to muddy the signal, so it responds to pure monetary information faster than anything else. Being the most reactive isn’t a weakness — it’s Bitcoin being the most honest barometer of what the Fed actually just said.

📉 THE FIFTH REJECTION, THE FLUSH, THE HOLD. Per CryptoTimes: Bitcoin failed at $87,000 a fifth time, slid to ~$83,600, and saw $546M in leveraged positions wiped — but it held above $83,300 and stayed inside its range.The hawkish minutes, the oil spike, the 2002-high yields all hit at once, and BTC absorbed the combined blow without losing its structure. The line everyone’s watching now is $80,000 — the floor that defines whether this is a pullback or something deeper. Five rejections and a half-billion-dollar flush, and the range still holds. That’s resilience wearing a red candle.

🛢️ A MACRO STORM, NOT A BITCOIN STORM. Per KuCoin/FXStreet: today’s weakness was entirely externally sourced — hawkish Fed minutes, oil spiking on Iranian tanker attacks, long-end yields near multi-decade highs, a risk-off across everything leveraged. None of it touched Bitcoin’s fundamentals: the network, the 21M cap, the adoption, the SEC custody door — all exactly as they were yesterday. The price fell on the weather, not on the foundation. For the Faith pillar, that distinction is everything: when the storm comes from outside and the structure inside is untouched, what you’re feeling is turbulence, not damage.

🗝️ Powered By Bitkey

Your keys. Your coins. No single point of failure.
A $546M liquidation day is a reminder: leverage and custody mistakes hurt people in storms, not Bitcoin itself. Bitkey is self-custody done right — a 2-of-3 setup across your phone, a hardware device, and a recovery key, so you hold your coins and no single lost seed can wipe you out. Own it yourself, ride out the weather, no single point of failure.
Not financial advice. Just your keys, your coins — done safely. 🗝️

🌅 THE WEDNESDAY THOUGHT — FAITH (PM EDITION)

Being The One Who Feels It

Every market heard the same Fed minutes today. Stocks shrugged. Gold shrugged. Bitcoin flinched. And the easy read is that Bitcoin is the fragile, jumpy one — too sensitive, too emotional. But look closer: Bitcoin reacted because it was the one actually listening — the one asset pure enough to register the signal without filtering it through earnings reports and old habits. Sometimes the one who feels it most is simply the one paying the most honest attention.

There’s a quiet faith lesson in that. We often treat our own sensitivity as a flaw — I feel things too strongly, I react too much, everyone else seems unbothered. But sensitivity is also perception: the capacity to register what’s really happening while others have numbed themselves to it. The person in the room who feels the tension, the grief, the wrongness that everyone else is politely ignoring isn’t broken — they’re awake. The gift and the burden are the same thing. The goal isn’t to stop feeling so you can be as unbothered as the shrugging crowd; it’s to let what you feel make you honest — a true barometer — without letting it toss you around.

Bitcoin felt the Fed and stayed inside its range. That’s the balance: feel it fully, register it honestly, and still hold your structure.

🎧 Sensitivity is perception — feeling it most can mean listening best.
🧭 Be an honest barometer, not a weathervane — register the signal, keep your footing.
⚓ Feel it fully; hold your structure anyway.

Bitcoin was the only one listening — and it held. Feel honestly, stay rooted. That’s not fragility; it’s being awake. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Where do you treat your own sensitivity — to tension, to wrongness, to what others ignore — as a flaw, when it might actually be you perceiving honestly what the “shruggers” have numbed themselves to?

One challenge tonight: Notice one thing you’re feeling strongly that others around you seem to be shrugging off. Instead of dismissing it as overreacting, ask: am I the weathervane, or the honest barometer here? Let the feeling inform you without tossing you — register it, then hold your footing. Awake beats numb.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News for Wednesday, October 7th, 2026. My name is Matt.

And if you were paying attention yesterday, Bitcoin had one of those moves that reminds you exactly what kind of market we’re in.

Bitcoin was sitting around $86K to $87K and then dropped to roughly $83K in about 20 minutes.

First of all, that was minor.

We’re still inside basically the same channel we’ve been trading in for weeks, and Bitcoin once again found support around the $82K to $83K area.

Nothing structurally dramatic has happened yet.

But I do want to remind everybody that crypto can move violently and those moves don’t always give you a warning.

Bitcoin has historically dropped 10%, 20%, even 30% in extremely short periods of time. With Bitcoin’s market cap where it is today, a move from $83K to $60K would represent an enormous amount of money leaving the market, but percentage-wise, moves like that are not unprecedented for Bitcoin.

So just because we’re trending higher and building this channel doesn’t mean everything automatically continues upward.

We can still get wrecked.

We also technically haven’t finished the historical four-year-cycle window we’ve been talking about. We’re only a few days away from when previous cycle patterns would have put in the low.

I don’t think we’re suddenly going back to $60K.

But crypto has taught me enough times not to pretend something can’t happen.

Oil, Yields and the Dollar Hit Bitcoin at the Same Time

So why did Bitcoin dump yesterday?

Look at the macro environment.

Brent crude is back above $100 a barrel.

The 10-year Treasury yield is back around 5.3%.

The 30-year pushed to approximately 5.7%, its highest level since 2002.

And the U.S. Dollar Index strengthened to around 102.1.

That’s basically a collection of things Bitcoin doesn’t want.

Oil goes higher.

Inflation concerns increase.

Treasury yields rise.

The dollar strengthens.

Risk assets get pressured.

Then once Bitcoin started moving lower, leverage took over.

Crypto liquidations reached roughly $550 million over 24 hours, with approximately $487 million coming from long positions.

That’s how you turn a normal move into a very fast move.

People are leveraged long.

Bitcoin drops.

Positions start getting liquidated.

Those liquidations create additional selling.

That triggers more liquidations.

And suddenly we’re at $83K.

Altcoins got hit even harder. Ethereum fell around 3.5% during the initial move, XRP was down around 3%, and by the time I recorded this morning, some of those losses had grown.

Bitcoin ETF flows were basically flat, with only around $3.2 million in net outflows. So I don’t look at this as an ETF-driven selloff.

This looks much more like oil, yields, the stronger dollar and leveraged positions combining at the wrong time.

There is also plenty of geopolitical uncertainty contributing to oil volatility right now. I’ve seen so many conflicting reports about Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, the Houthis, the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on energy infrastructure that I’m not going to pretend I know exactly what’s happening on the ground.

What I do know is oil is above $100 again.

That matters.

And I’m going to keep stacking sats.

Robinhood Buys Bitcoin as Stablecoin Companies Move Toward Banking

Let’s get into some institutional moves.

Robinhood has added $25 million worth of Bitcoin to its own balance sheet.

That’s not a Michael Saylor-sized Bitcoin treasury.

Robinhood isn’t suddenly turning itself into Strategy.

But it is notable because Robinhood is one of the largest retail brokerage platforms in the United States, and the company says the purchase is meant to demonstrate its commitment to Bitcoin and the broader crypto ecosystem.

We’ve spent years watching public companies go from offering crypto products to actually putting crypto on their own balance sheets.

Robinhood is now part of that story.

Rain, a stablecoin payments company, is also seeking an OCC national trust bank charter.

The proposed trust bank would custody dollars and digital assets, manage stablecoin reserves, and issue and redeem dollar-backed tokens.

Again, watch what is happening here.

Crypto companies aren’t just trying to work around the banking system anymore.

Some of them are trying to become regulated pieces of the banking and payments infrastructure.

The U.S. government also moved more than $100 million in crypto associated with government-controlled wallets.

Blockchain tracking picked up the movement, but there is no confirmation that the government sold those assets.

Moving crypto does not mean selling crypto.

That’s an important distinction.

The Fed, CFTC and the Question of Who Actually Makes the Rules

The big macro event today is the release of the Federal Reserve’s September meeting minutes.

Markets will be looking for how strongly policymakers supported the September rate hike and how divided they are about additional tightening.

Markets are currently assigning only around a 20% probability of another October hike.

And I keep saying the same thing.

I don’t completely understand why they wouldn’t keep going.

The entire point of raising rates is to slow demand.

You’re trying to break things.

Not destroy everything, obviously, but cool things down enough to bring inflation under control.

And I’m not convinced we’ve broken enough yet.

Look at the capital spending happening around AI and data centers.

We’re talking about one of the largest infrastructure build-outs in American history.

That spending is helping drive parts of the economy and stock market at the same time policymakers are trying to cool demand.

How exactly does the Fed balance that?

And does any of this actually translate into prices coming back down for normal people?

I don’t think most prices are going back down.

Maybe energy comes down.

Maybe we get cheaper gasoline again.

But generally, once consumers demonstrate they’ll pay a certain price, companies don’t suddenly decide to lower it because they’re feeling generous.

On crypto regulation, the CFTC’s new rulemaking remains one of the most important structural stories.

The agency has started the process of developing a federal framework for leveraged, margined and financed retail crypto transactions.

The proposal could create a federal regulatory pathway for exchanges offering those products, with rules addressing market manipulation, customer protection and reserve requirements.

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig’s broader argument is that the CFTC and SEC already possess enough statutory authority to begin writing significant crypto rules even though Congress failed to pass CLARITY.

And this gets back to the concern I raised yesterday.

Maybe I like the rules these agencies create.

Maybe I think they’re exactly what the industry needs.

That still doesn’t make agency regulation the same thing as legislation.

A new administration can bring a different regulatory philosophy.

Enforcement priorities can change.

Rules can be rewritten or interpreted differently.

That’s why Congress still matters.

Congress is messy.

Democracy is messy.

But legislation is generally more durable than regulators deciding what existing laws allow them to do.

So I understand why the agencies are moving without Congress.

The industry needs rules.

But I don’t think Congress gets to say, “Well, the agencies handled it, we’re done.”

If everything eventually goes tits up, blame Congress.

Cardano Adds Permissioned Assets as Another Ethereum L2 Shuts Down

Cardano has introduced a new programmable-token standard that allows issuers to build things like freeze, seize, KYC, sanctions and transfer restrictions directly into tokens issued on Cardano.

And there’s an important distinction here.

This does not mean ADA itself suddenly has a freeze button.

The Cardano base layer remains permissionless.

What it means is that somebody issuing a regulated asset on Cardano can choose to make that particular asset permissioned.

That could include stablecoins, tokenized funds, bonds and other financial assets that need identity checks or sanctions controls.

And I’m actually okay with that distinction.

Bitcoin and crypto were built around this concept of permissionless money.

The idea is that everybody has the ability to participate and transact without someone arbitrarily deciding they aren’t allowed.

But if the base layer remains permissionless and somebody voluntarily builds a permissioned financial product on top of it, users have a choice.

You want the permissionless asset?

Use the permissionless asset.

You want a regulated tokenized fund with KYC and transfer restrictions?

You opt into that system.

That’s different from making the entire blockchain permissioned.

And I think that distinction is going to become increasingly important as traditional financial products move onchain.

Then we have another Ethereum Layer 2 shutting down.

Abstract, the network built by Pudgy Penguins parent company Igloo, is shutting down on December 15th after the company lost tens of millions of dollars supporting it.

Users need to move their assets before the shutdown.

There are still tens of millions of dollars sitting on the network.

And this comes less than a week after Blast announced that it was winding down its own Ethereum Layer 2.

Abstract processed more than 325 million transactions, generated billions of dollars in decentralized-exchange volume and attracted millions of wallets.

And it still couldn’t make the economics work.

That’s the interesting part.

Transaction count doesn’t automatically equal a sustainable business.

Users don’t automatically equal a sustainable business.

Volume doesn’t automatically equal a sustainable business.

If you’re only generating a few thousand dollars in chain fees over a 24-hour period while spending enormous amounts of money operating and subsidizing the network, eventually somebody has to look at the numbers and say, “Why are we doing this?”

That’s now two recognizable Ethereum Layer 2 networks shutting down in less than a week.

We’ve been talking about L2 economics for a while.

Now the market is forcing the issue.

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin is sitting around $83,620, down approximately 3% over 24 hours and basically flat over seven days.

So we’ve essentially erased the gains we had earlier in the week.

Ethereum is around $2,570, down approximately 5.2% over 24 hours and around 4.5% for the week.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is around $766, down approximately 2.1% and roughly flat over seven days.

XRP is approximately $1.44, down around 4.4% over both 24 hours and seven days.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $117, down approximately 2.5% over 24 hours and around 2% for the week.

Hyperliquid is approximately $89.17, down around 4.6% over 24 hours, but still up approximately 2.8% for the week.

Zcash is around $1,294, down approximately 5.2% over 24 hours and almost 7% over seven days.

Zcash is getting absolutely slammed.

Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.84 trillion, down around 3%.

Fear & Greed: 62, Greed, although we’re getting pretty close to neutral territory again.

My Take

Yesterday’s drop doesn’t change my Bitcoin thesis yet.

We tried $87K again.

We failed.

Then Bitcoin dropped quickly back toward the bottom of the range we’ve been watching.

And what happened?

It used roughly $82K to $83K as support again.

So we’re still here.

That’s frustrating if you want number go up every single day, but structurally we’re still basically inside the same channel.

What I don’t want people doing is assuming that because $82K has held repeatedly, it therefore has to hold forever.

That’s not how Bitcoin works.

A 20% Bitcoin move can happen incredibly quickly.

Leverage can make that movement substantially worse.

And with oil back above $100, the 10-year around 5.3%, the 30-year around 5.7% and the dollar strengthening, we have legitimate macro pressure on the market.

The other story I’m increasingly interested in is the split between permissionless infrastructure and permissioned financial products.

Cardano is a good example.

The base network can remain permissionless while a regulated stablecoin or tokenized bond built on top of it has compliance controls.

I actually think that’s a reasonable model.

People who want completely permissionless assets can use them.

Institutions that legally need KYC, sanctions enforcement and transfer restrictions can build products with those controls.

You don’t necessarily have to force one philosophy onto the entire network.

And then there are the Ethereum Layer 2 shutdowns.

Blast and Abstract shutting down within days of each other is a reminder that crypto networks still have to produce sustainable economics.

You can have millions of wallets.

You can have hundreds of millions of transactions.

You can have billions in volume.

Eventually, the math still has to work.

For Bitcoin, though, we’re back where we started.

Hold $82K to $83K.

Then let’s make another run at $87K.

And remember that just because we’ve been going sideways doesn’t mean Bitcoin can’t suddenly decide to remind everybody what volatility actually looks like.

Have a great day.

Happy HODLing

“All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.”
— Blaise Pascal

🎵 Song of the Day: “The Waiting” — Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers — ringing, restless, the hardest part set to music.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Tuesday Evening · Yahoo + KuCoin + InvestingNews)

🟧 BTC: $85,400 (flat · coiled mid-$85Ks under the yearly open) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,700 (holding $2,700)
🌐 XRP: $1.50 (steady)
🟣 SOL: $119 (holding $115+)

The Hold: working range $84,000–$87,200; a daily close above $87,200 confirms the next leg, $84K the floor
The Lid: 10-year yield near 5.25% — the macro ceiling; October hike odds now just ~19–22%
The Self-Custody Win: Treasury formally withdrew its self-hosted-wallet + crypto-mixer rule proposals today — a quiet regulatory positive
Tomorrow: September FOMC minutes (Oct 7) · then CPI Oct 14 — the catalysts traders are waiting on

Support: $84,000 → $82,500 (range floor) → $82,281 → $80,000
Resistance: $87,200 (yearly open / breakout line) → $90,000 → $93,000

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

⏳ A MACRO WAITING ROOM. Per KuCoin: Bitcoin spent the day coiled in the mid-$85,000s, holding its $84K–$87,200 range as traders sit on their hands ahead of tomorrow’s FOMC minutes and next week’s CPI. The stall is explicitly “a pause, not a breakdown” — a failed expansion at $87K, not a trend reversal. Nobody wants to pay up for a breakout until the catalysts print. The market isn’t weak; it’s waiting — powder dry, range intact, everyone holding their position until the Fed minutes and CPI give them a reason to move. The patience is the position right now.

🔑 TREASURY DROPPED TWO ANTI-CRYPTO RULES. Per InvestingNews: the US Treasury formally withdrew its proposed self-hosted-wallet reporting rule and its crypto-mixer rule today — a genuine self-custody win that got lost in the macro waiting game. The rules would have burdened people who hold their own keys; pulling them keeps self-custody friction-free. It’s the same pattern all month: the regulatory tide keeps turning toward Bitcoin, not against it — the SEC’s RIA custody path last week, these withdrawals today. The right to hold your own keys, unburdened, just got reaffirmed — quietly, while everyone watched the chart.

🧊 THE HONEST LID — 5.25% YIELDS. Per InvestingNews, Bitget’s Lacie Zhang framed it cleanly: the Fed repricing already gave Bitcoin a boost, and “ETF demand remains supportive, but it is not yet strong enough on its own to force a breakout.” The missing ingredient is spot demand strong enough to overpower a 10-year yield near 5.25% — the macro ceiling. A real breakout needs steady ETF inflows plus direct buying, and today’s small outflows show it’s not quite there yet. The bull case is intact but incomplete: the demand has to out-muscle the yield, and tomorrow’s minutes are the next test of whether it can.

🗝️ Powered By Bitkey

Your keys. Your coins. No single point of failure.
Treasury just reaffirmed your right to hold your own Bitcoin — so hold it right. Bitkey is self-custody without the fragility: a 2-of-3 setup split across your phone, a hardware device, and a recovery key, so youcontrol your coins and no single lost seed phrase can wipe you out. True self-sovereignty, minus the single point of failure that’s burned so many solo holders.
Not financial advice. Just your keys, your coins — done safely. 🗝️

🌅 THE TUESDAY THOUGHT — FINANCIAL (PM EDITION)

The Patience Is The Position

Bitcoin did almost nothing today. It sat in a tight range, coiled under the yearly open, waiting on tomorrow’s Fed minutes — and to an impatient eye, “did nothing” looks like “nothing’s working.” But in markets, as Pascal knew, the ability to sit quietly and do nothing is often the entire skill. Today the smart money’s position was patience: powder dry, range held, no reaching.

Here’s the financial truth that’s almost impossible to feel in the moment: not-acting is a position, and often the best one.We’re wired to equate activity with progress — to feel that if we’re not buying, selling, adjusting, doing something, we’re falling behind. So we overtrade, chase the breakout before it confirms, and hand our edge to the patient party on the other side. But the professional knows the waiting room isn’t wasted time — it’s where you preserve your capital and your optionality until the setup is actually worth acting on. Sitting quietly, powder dry, waiting for the catalyst, is not passivity. It’s discipline that looks like passivity.

The hardest trade today was the one nobody made: just sitting still. If you can do that without itching to act, you already have the rarest financial skill there is.

🪑 Not-acting is a position — often the strongest one.
⏳ Activity isn’t progress — overtrading hands your edge away.
⚓ Sitting quietly with powder dry is discipline, not passivity.

BTC sat in the waiting room all day. So did the pros. Learn to sit still — the patience is the position. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Where are you itching to act — to trade, tweak, or chase — simply because sitting still feels like falling behind, when doing nothing might be the strongest move on the board?

One challenge tonight: Find the one decision you’re tempted to force before its catalyst arrives, and deliberately wait on it — powder dry, position held. Practice sitting quietly in the room. The market’s best players spend most of their time doing exactly that. The patience is the position. ⚓

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

WATCH THIS!

It’s your Daily Crypto News. My name is Matt. It’s Tuesday, October 6th, 2026.

And we have Bitcoin news. We have crypto news. That’s why we’re Daily Crypto News.

Bitcoin got rejected from $87,000 again.

Not happy about this.

The 10-year Treasury is sitting around 5.3%, the 2-year is around 4.8%, and Brent crude is back around $98 a barrel.

Markets are now putting roughly a 78% probability on the Fed leaving rates unchanged at its next meeting. Again, I don’t really understand why they would, but whatever.

Bitcoin ETFs also turned negative Monday with approximately $89.8 million in net outflows.

Boo.

But it’s okay. We’ve had some enormous inflows, so one negative day isn’t the end of the world.

For Bitcoin, I keep coming back to the same thing.

We have to break $87K.

And to be perfectly honest, I think we need to get above $90K, or at least touch it, and then start using $86K to $87K as the floor.

If we don’t, it doesn’t really matter.

We’re still in the same channel.

We love going sideways.

Although we’ve been going up and then sideways, so technically that’s better.

All right, cool.

Let’s get into it.

Solana Builds for Institutions as Tokenization Moves Into Private Markets

The Solana Foundation launched Solana DvP, an open-source delivery-versus-payment system designed to allow institutions to settle trades automatically onchain in seconds rather than waiting days for traditional settlement.

JPMorgan provided input into the design.

Delivery versus payment basically means that the asset and the payment change hands simultaneously. You’re reducing the settlement risk created when one side of a transaction completes before the other.

Literally what crypto was designed to do.

This is the entire idea of having a system where you don’t have to trust that one side is going to do what it promised after the other side already performed.

And I love that JPMorgan is involved in this.

I’m telling you, one day it’s going to come out that Jamie Dimon is the biggest Bitcoin holder on Earth.

He’s going to be like, “Yeah, I’ve actually been holding a million Bitcoin the entire time. I just shit on it for ten years because I wanted to buy the dip.”

I’m joking.

Probably.

Tokenization is also moving into an entirely different market.

Ondo Finance is bringing pre-IPO private-company exposure onchain.

Ondo launched tokenized notes designed to provide economic exposure to private companies before they go public, beginning with the AI sector. The products are designed to trade 24/7 on secondary markets, with their eventual payouts tied to the value realized by the referenced company’s shares at a qualifying liquidity event.

And that’s where I have questions.

This isn’t necessarily the same thing as actually owning private-company equity.

That’s the distinction I want to understand.

If I’m buying a token tied to the value of a private company, do I actually own part of that company?

Or do I own a financial instrument designed to replicate the economic performance of that company’s shares?

If the company goes public, does my token somehow convert into actual public shares?

Or does the note simply settle based on the value of those shares?

Those mechanics matter.

But either way, we’re moving into another stage of tokenization.

We’ve already seen tokenized Treasuries.

We’ve seen tokenized funds.

We’ve seen tokenized public stocks.

Now we’re moving into private-market exposure.

That’s a big deal.

Spiko is another company growing quickly in this space. The tokenized cash-fund manager raised $90 million, bringing its total capital raised to approximately $120 million. The company now manages roughly $2.7 billion in tokenized cash funds and plans to use the new capital to expand into additional markets.

This stuff just keeps moving.

Corporate Crypto Treasuries Keep Buying

Corporate crypto treasuries aren’t slowing down either.

Strategy bought another 334 Bitcoin for approximately $29 million.

Strive made a much larger purchase, adding another 2,000 Bitcoin, its biggest acquisition since June.

And BitMine added another 15,112 ETH, pushing its Ethereum holdings above 6 million ETH, representing roughly 4.9% of Ethereum’s circulating supply.

Think about that for a second.

One public company is approaching 5% of the entire ETH supply.

We talk constantly about ETFs and institutional adoption, but corporate treasury accumulation is another source of demand that continues removing assets from the market.

And these companies keep buying.

The CFTC Starts Building a Federal Crypto Framework Without Congress

Now we get into the regulatory stuff.

The CFTC published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking laying the groundwork for a federal regulatory framework covering leveraged, margined and financed retail crypto transactions.

The basic idea is to begin creating a uniform federal framework rather than forcing crypto companies to rely entirely on a patchwork of state-level requirements.

The framework would be particularly relevant to exchanges offering retail leverage or margin, with potential requirements around customer protection, market manipulation and reserves.

And CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is making an important argument.

Congress isn’t necessarily the only route anymore.

His position is that the CFTC and SEC already possess statutory authority that allows them to begin establishing federal crypto rules even though Congress failed to pass the CLARITY Act.

And this is where I have mixed feelings.

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that I agree with every single rule these agencies create.

Great.

We finally have rules.

Companies know what they’re allowed to do.

Consumers know what protections exist.

Everybody can start building.

But there’s still a problem.

Regulation is not the same thing as legislation.

An agency can create a regulatory framework under one administration, and then another administration comes in with a completely different philosophy.

Enforcement priorities change.

Interpretations change.

Rules can change.

Loopholes can be treated differently.

That’s why Congress still matters.

Democracy is messy.

Congress is slow.

Congress can be a limp-wiener, feckless institution that seemingly can’t do anything.

But legislation creates something more durable than an agency deciding how it interprets existing authority.

And that’s what worries me.

The agencies may create exactly the rules crypto needs today.

But what happens when a different administration comes in five years from now?

What happens if the people running those agencies don’t understand the technology as well?

What happens if their priorities completely change?

That’s why comprehensive legislation still matters.

So when everything eventually goes tits up, blame Congress.

FinCEN Backs Away From Broad Self-Custody Reporting Rules

We also got an important development around self-custody.

FinCEN officially withdrew a proposed rule dating back to 2020 that would have imposed additional reporting, recordkeeping and identity-verification requirements on certain transactions involving unhosted or self-custody wallets.

The original proposal would have required banks and money-services businesses to report certain transactions above $10,000 involving private wallets and maintain records for certain transactions above $3,000.

FinCEN also withdrew its 2023 proposal that would have treated convertible virtual currency mixing as a broad class of transactions of primary money-laundering concern.

That doesn’t mean the government suddenly doesn’t care about illicit crypto activity.

Treasury can still target specific mixers, sanctioned entities and laundering networks.

The difference is between targeting specific illicit activity and creating broad reporting requirements that affect huge categories of legitimate users.

And I think that’s an important distinction, particularly when we’re talking about self-custody.

ZachXBT Says He Infiltrated a Lazarus-Linked Laundering Network

This next story is wild.

Every time I see ZachXBT in a headline, I’m interested because this person does some incredible blockchain investigative work.

And I say “this person” because ZachXBT is pseudonymous.

ZachXBT says he personally fronted roughly $350,000 while posing as a client to infiltrate a Chinese organized-crime network allegedly laundering crypto connected to North Korea’s Lazarus Group.

According to ZachXBT, the network handled more than $1 billion connected to multiple Lazarus-linked crypto exploits.

The intelligence gathered during the operation reportedly helped trace and freeze funds connected to the massive Bybit hack and identify additional illicit wallets.

If accurate, that’s fucking wild.

Think about the commitment involved here.

You’re not just sitting behind a computer looking at wallet addresses.

You’re putting up $350,000 and posing as a customer of an organized laundering operation to get inside the network.

That’s a completely different level of blockchain investigation.

It also shows something important about crypto investigations.

The blockchain gives investigators a public ledger.

But the blockchain alone doesn’t solve everything.

You still need traditional investigative work, undercover techniques, intelligence gathering and people connecting identities and organizations to what is happening onchain.

Also, ZachXBT apparently has $350,000 sitting around to throw into an undercover operation.

Tree fiddy.

Ethereum Tests Glamsterdam as Bond Volatility Sends a Warning

Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade activates on the Sepolia testnet today.

The test is part of Ethereum’s next round of scaling and infrastructure improvements, with developers using Sepolia to see how the changes perform before anything eventually reaches mainnet.

Meanwhile, smaller altcoins have been outperforming while Bitcoin continues moving sideways.

But there’s something happening in the bond market that I’m watching.

The MOVE Index, which is essentially a measure of expected volatility in the Treasury market, has jumped while equity volatility and Bitcoin volatility remain comparatively subdued.

What does that mean?

We’ll see.

But if the bond market is suddenly pricing significantly more uncertainty while Bitcoin is sitting around $86K acting like nothing is happening, that’s worth watching.

Today, I’m watching Treasury yields.

I’m watching oil.

And I’m watching Bitcoin at $87K.

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin is sitting around $86,290, basically flat over the last 24 hours.

And by the way, CoinMarketCap has this little Flappy Bird game where you’re trying to keep the bird inside the Bollinger Bands by pressing the space bar.

It is ridiculously hard.

I don’t know why anybody plays this.

Ethereum is around $2,713, basically even from yesterday.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is around $785, down approximately 0.6%.

XRP is approximately $1.51, basically flat.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $120, essentially unchanged.

TRON is approximately $0.335, down around 0.4%.

Hyperliquid is around $93.64, up approximately 0.8%.

Zcash is around $1,370, up approximately 3%.

Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.93 trillion.

Fear & Greed: 68, Greed.

My Take

Bitcoin is frustrating me.

We’re right back at the same level we’ve been talking about.

Break $87K.

That’s it.

Yesterday, Craig Cobb walked through why that area is important technically. Today, we’re sitting around $86K after getting rejected again.

I don’t want another little wick above $87K and then right back down.

I want Bitcoin to get through it.

Then I want to see $90K.

And ultimately, I want $86K to $87K to become support instead of resistance.

Until that happens, we’re still basically in the same channel.

The bigger story today, though, is tokenization.

Solana is building institutional settlement infrastructure with input from JPMorgan.

Ondo is moving private-market exposure onchain.

Spiko has billions of dollars in tokenized cash funds.

Corporate treasuries continue accumulating Bitcoin and Ethereum.

This isn’t theoretical anymore.

We’re watching different pieces of traditional finance move onto blockchain infrastructure one at a time.

The regulatory side is more complicated.

I like that the CFTC and SEC aren’t sitting around doing nothing just because Congress failed to pass CLARITY.

The industry needs rules.

But I don’t think agency rulemaking is a complete substitute for legislation.

You want rules that survive administrations.

You want companies to know that the entire regulatory framework isn’t going to flip every four years depending on who’s sitting in the White House.

That’s Congress’s job.

So agencies moving forward is good.

Congress continuing to sit there doing nothing is not.

For Bitcoin, though, I have one request.

Break fucking $87K.

Have a great day.

Happy HODLing

“Take care of your body. It’s the only place you have to live.”
— Jim Rohn

🎵 Song of the Day: “Easy” — Commodores — smooth, unhurried, the sound of holding your level without strain.

📡 THE NEWS

📊 Market Snapshot

(Live · Monday Evening · CoinGecko + Fortune + Twelve Data)

🟧 BTC: $85,900 (-0.6% · third $87K rejection, eased back, held $85K) 🟢
🔵 ETH: $2,700 (holding $2,700)
🌐 XRP: $1.50 (steady)
🟣 SOL: $120 (holding $120)

The Day: rejected a third time near $87,000, faded to ~$85.9K — but the $85K shelf held on the pullback
The Week: still +2.9% on the 7-day · one year off the ATH ($126,080), BTC’s ~32% below it
F&G: 65 (Greed) · daily range $85,014–$86,995
The Backdrop: October Fed hike priced out; FOMC minutes Wednesday the near-term catalyst

Support: $85,000 (held — the shelf) → $83,000 → $82,281 → $80,000
Resistance: $87,000 (3rd rejection) → $90,000 → $95,000

⚓ Three Bitcoin Stories That Defined Today

🧱 THIRD $87K REJECTION — BUT THE SHELF HELD. Per CoinGecko: Bitcoin tapped toward $87,000 for a third time, got turned back, and eased to ~$85,900 — down less than 1% on the day. The level everyone’s watching rejected price again, and yet the pullback was shallow: BTC held its $85K shelf rather than giving back the week’s gains. That’s the constructive read under a red candle — a market that gets rejected at resistance but refuses to surrender its new floor is coiling, not rolling over. Three tests of $87K on a rising base usually means the wall is being worn down, not winning.

🗓️ ONE YEAR FROM THE TOP. Per Cryptoticker: today marks roughly one year since Bitcoin’s all-time high ($126,080 on Oct 6, 2025) — and BTC sits ~32% below it at ~$86K, having bottomed near $58K in June and recovered most of the way back. The anniversary is a useful mile-marker: a year ago was the euphoric top; the months since were the drawdown, the base, and now the recovery. The worst of the post-top digestion is behind, the bottom is in, and Bitcoin enters year two off the high climbing, not bleeding. A year is a long time in crypto — and this one ended in a far better place than it spent most of its middle.

🟢 GREED, BUT NOT FROTH. Per Changelly data: the Fear & Greed Index sits at 65 (Greed) — elevated but not the manic 80s+ that mark blow-off tops. Paired with a shallow pullback and a held shelf, it reads as healthy positioning: enough optimism to fuel the next push, not so much that the tape is dangerously one-sided. Sentiment warm, structure intact, froth absent — the combination that lets a market grind higher rather than spike and crash. The third $87K knock plus a firm $85K floor is the picture of a market consolidating for a move, not against one.

🌱 Powered By Huel

Complete nutrition. Zero decisions.
Week 1 is Diet, and today’s lesson is holding your level without strain — Bitcoin didn’t give back its gains, and the healthiest diet is the one you hold without white-knuckling it. Huel is complete food in one step: protein, carbs, fats, 26 vitamins and minerals, no junk, no guesswork. The clean baseline you can hold easily, day after day, beats the strict plan you abandon by Friday. Hold the shelf; make it effortless.
New to Huel? Use referral code REF-PAULM4588 at checkout.
Not medical advice. Just complete fuel for a body built to carry the stack. 🌱

🌅 THE MONDAY THOUGHT — HEALTH · WEEK 1: DIET (PM EDITION)

Don’t Give Back The Gains

Bitcoin got rejected at $87K today, eased off — and held its $85K shelf. It didn’t surrender the ground it had fought to take. And that’s the quietly decisive skill in diet, and in health generally: not every day is for making progress; many days are just for not giving back the progress you already made.

We obsess over the gaining days — the perfect week, the new personal best, the breakthrough. But the real battle of any health journey isn’t the climbing; it’s the holding. Most people don’t fail by failing to progress — they fail by giving backtheir progress, over and over: the clean month erased by the blowout week, the fitness gained in spring surrendered by fall, the shelf reached and then abandoned. The body, like the market, builds durably only when each level reached gets held long enough to become the new baseline. A day where you didn’t advance but didn’t retreat — where you held your shelf — isn’t a wasted day. It’s how the gain becomes permanent.

You don’t have to set a personal record today. You just have to not give back the ground you already took.

🛡️ Holding the gain is its own win — not every day is for advancing.
🔁 Most failure is giving back progress, not failing to make it.
⚓ Hold the shelf until it becomes your baseline.

BTC held $85K instead of surrendering it. Hold your shelf today — that’s how the progress sticks. ⚓

🎯 Your Move

One question: Where do you keep giving back your health gains — the clean stretch undone by the blowout, the shelf reached and then abandoned — instead of simply holding the ground you already won?

One challenge tonight: Pick the gain you’re most at risk of surrendering, and just hold it today — no new record required, only no retreat. Holding the shelf until it’s your baseline is how progress stops being temporary. Don’t give back the ground.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

WATCH THIS!

It is your Daily Crypto News for Monday, October 5th, 2026. My name is Matt.

And we have Craig Cobb coming up in a little bit to talk about Bitcoin pushing toward $87,000 and where the market goes from here.

Bitcoin climbed as high as roughly $86,950 before falling back into the $86K range.

Before we get to Craig, let’s take a quick look at the macro picture.

Friday’s U.S. jobs report showed approximately 29,000 new payrolls in September, well below expectations, while unemployment rose to 4.2%.

Markets responded by dramatically reducing expectations for another October Fed rate hike.

And I don’t really understand why the odds changed that much off one jobs report.

Yes, 29,000 jobs is weak.

But unemployment at 4.2% is still historically low, and inflation hasn’t suddenly disappeared. I understand becoming more cautious, but I don’t know why you would completely change your policy path because of one jobs report.

We’ll see what the Fed does.

The Treasury market is still crazy.

The 2-year is around 4.8%.

The 10-year is around 5.25%.

The 30-year is around 5.6%.

The 10-year has come down from roughly 5.34% last week, but come on.

These are still enormous yields.

Bitcoin ETF flows also turned positive again Friday, bringing in approximately $189.8 million. BlackRock took in the lion’s share at around $158.2 million.

So Bitcoin is pushing toward $87K, ETF flows are positive again, and the macro environment is still weird.

Let’s bring in Craig.

Craig Cobb’s Market Update

Start your free 7-day trial of Market Intern:

https://marketintern.com

Subscribe to Craig Cobb’s free Tuesday newsletter:

https://www.thegrowmeco.com

Good everybody, welcome to another week.

I’m back after the school holidays, and Bitcoin is getting really interesting.

If you’ve been following my newsletter or the work I’ve been doing around Bitcoin’s three-month chart, this is the level I’ve been watching.

Bitcoin’s Three-Month Chart Is at a Critical Point

The three-month candle closed at the beginning of October.

The high of that candle is approximately $87,374.

Bitcoin hasn’t broken that level yet.

But if it does, that could be a very important technical development.

When we’ve previously had a bullish three-month candle after a significant pullback into these moving averages, then closed that candle bullish and broken its high, Bitcoin hasn’t revisited the prior lows.

That doesn’t guarantee anything.

But it makes this three-month candle extremely important.

I think we’re already seeing the beginning of the end of the bear market structure.

If Bitcoin can break that high, that strengthens the case considerably.

It’s exciting.

But we’re not there yet.

The Weekly Bitcoin Trend Has Turned Higher

Now let’s look at the weekly chart.

Bitcoin finished another positive week, up around 2.43%.

More importantly, we have a higher low and a higher high.

That gives us a weekly uptrend.

We’ve also broken the monthly downtrend.

That does not mean the monthly chart is officially in an uptrend yet.

But the weekly chart is.

And things are starting to look much better for Bitcoin.

The daily chart is still a little messy.

Bitcoin pulled back into the cradle zone, printed a bullish candle and is starting to move back out.

Again, what I really want to see is that three-month candle high taken out.

If Bitcoin pushes through that level and gives us another higher high to go with the higher low, then we can start talking about a proper daily uptrend as well.

Right now, we don’t really have that.

It’s still consolidation.

Not much happened through most of last week, and most of the week’s move came during that final Sunday candle.

What I’m Looking for as a Trader

There is a developing resistance level on the shorter time frames.

It’s not perfect yet.

I’d like to see Bitcoin test that area again and then pull back into a higher low.

If I get that structure, there may be an opportunity to trade the breakout.

Otherwise, if Bitcoin simply pushes straight through the resistance level, I’ll be watching for pullbacks into that former resistance once the trend is established.

That’s what I want.

I don’t need to guess.

I want the market to confirm the trend and then look for the setup.

Ethereum, BNB, Solana, XRP and TRON

As far as the rest of the market is concerned, let’s have a look.

Ethereum has a pretty obvious level around $2,800 that needs to break.

It’s sitting in a solid consolidation.

I’d like to see it push out of that range with the broader market.

BNB has pulled back and is starting to move higher again.

There’s not much going on yet on the daily or four-hour charts, but it’s still progressing to the upside.

Solana is consolidating as well.

Hopefully we see it push through with the broader market and take another leg higher.

XRP is doing its thing.

TRON does what TRON does, which is basically whatever it wants.

Zcash, Hyperliquid and Monero

Zcash has produced a very clean pullback on the two-day chart.

It’s still an extremely strong chart.

The pullback has some depth to it, but that’s not surprising considering the enormous move Zcash had before it.

Hyperliquid is picking up the pace today and leading the market higher.

The trends aren’t giving me a huge amount to sink my teeth into on the lower time frames just yet.

But if these moves continue, opportunities should start presenting themselves over the coming days, particularly if we get clean pullbacks into the moving averages.

Monero is also sitting in consolidation on the daily chart.

Overall, the market looks pretty healthy.

What I really want to see now is Bitcoin leg higher.

And honestly, I want the whole market to leg higher.

That gets us back into a much more positive environment.

I’m not going to jinx it.

But the market doesn’t look terrible.

It actually looks pretty healthy.

I’ve had an entire week off, and this is literally the first proper look I’ve had at the charts.

You’re basically getting a raw top-10 scan.

And that’s what I’m seeing.

Have a fantastic day.

Start your free 7-day trial of Market Intern:

https://marketintern.com

Subscribe to Craig Cobb’s free Tuesday newsletter:

https://www.thegrowmeco.com

Thank you, Mr. Cobb.

Now let’s get into the headlines.

Kraken Builds 24/7 Settlement as Tokenized Stocks Move Forward

Kraken’s parent company, Payward, is building out 24/7 institutional dollar settlement.

The company integrated with a real-time clearing network serving selected institutional digital-asset clients in Asia and the Gulf region.

The important part is that deposits can become available for trading outside normal banking hours.

That’s where the infrastructure has to go.

Crypto trades 24/7.

Banks don’t.

If institutions want to participate in digital-asset markets around the clock, the settlement infrastructure eventually has to work around the clock too.

We’re also seeing more movement around tokenized U.S. stocks.

A venture involving OKX and Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, has filed with the SEC seeking to create a U.S. tokenized-securities venue.

The plan is to offer round-the-clock trading in U.S. securities.

This follows the SEC’s recent innovation exemptions around tokenized securities.

And this goes back to something we’ve been talking about since the CLARITY Act failed.

The important regulatory story right now isn’t new legislation.

It’s implementation.

The SEC continues advancing crypto custody rules.

Tokenized-stock exemptions are already being used.

The CFTC continues developing crypto rules under existing authority.

Companies are now filing actual products around these frameworks.

Congress didn’t pass CLARITY.

The regulatory system didn’t stop.

The agencies kept moving.

The Fed Minutes Arrive Wednesday

The September FOMC minutes come out Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern.

Markets will be looking at how divided policymakers were over the September rate increase and how strongly they were leaning toward additional hikes.

After Friday’s weak jobs report, those minutes could influence expectations for the next several meetings.

Again, I understand why they’re cautious.

I just don’t completely understand why one jobs report would make you abandon a rate path if inflation is still the bigger issue.

Yes, 29,000 new jobs isn’t much.

But unemployment at 4.2% is still low.

Maybe the Fed sees something I don’t.

They probably do.

We’ll see what the minutes say.

Ethereum Has Huge Staking Queues in Both Directions

Ethereum has something pretty interesting happening with staking.

Approximately 786,000 ETH, worth more than $2 billion, is currently queued to leave staking, with estimated waiting times approaching two weeks.

At the same time, around 1.5 million ETH is waiting to enter staking, with an entry queue around 25 days.

So this isn’t some Ethereum bank run.

There is actually more ETH waiting to enter staking than leave it.

But the staking system is dealing with an unusually large amount of validator movement at the same time.

Why?

I don’t know.

Maybe people want liquidity.

Maybe ETH’s price is attractive enough that people want to take some money off the table.

Maybe people didn’t expect ETH to still be around $2,700 during what was supposed to be the ugly part of the cycle.

Maybe somebody needs holiday money.

I don’t know.

And I’ve said “I don’t know” a lot today.

But that’s better than making up some shit.

Zcash Tests a Faster Network as Blast Shuts Down

Zcash has activated testing for its NU7 upgrade.

The upgrade is designed to reduce the network’s target block time from approximately 75 seconds to 25 seconds.

The current plan is for a mainnet launch on November 5, pending the results of public testing.

The upgrade also changes how transaction fees and mining rewards are handled, directing a portion into a reserve for future mining rewards while reducing individual block rewards so overall issuance doesn’t accelerate.

Ethereum developers are also preparing to test the Glamsterdam upgrade on the Sepolia testnet this week.

The test is intended as a major rehearsal for changes involving account abstraction and data availability.

Meanwhile, Blast is shutting down its Layer 2.

Blast was one of the better-known Ethereum Layer 2 launches from the previous cycle and was backed by Paradigm.

But operating costs exceeded revenue.

And that’s what happens.

Eventually, you have to make money.

That’s noteworthy because we’re starting to see real economic discipline hit the Layer 2 market.

You can have hype.

You can have users.

You can have a token.

But eventually the business still has to work.

What to Watch Today

We have a couple of U.S. economic releases today.

S&P Global Services PMI comes out at 9:45 a.m. Eastern.

Then ISM Services PMI arrives at 10 a.m. Eastern.

The ISM services index is expected to remain solidly in expansion territory.

These numbers matter because the market is trying to answer the same question we’ve been talking about.

Is the economy slowing enough that the Fed stops tightening?

Or is activity still strong enough that inflation remains the bigger problem?

We’ll find out.

Crypto Prices

Bitcoin is sitting around $85,930, up approximately 0.8% over 24 hours and around 3.5% over seven days.

Ethereum is around $2,711, up roughly 0.4%.

USDT remains number three.

BNB is approximately $789, basically flat.

XRP is around $1.51, up approximately 1%.

USDC remains number six.

Solana is around $120, down roughly 0.6% over 24 hours but still positive on the week.

Remember, Solana was around $50 not that long ago.

I was saying at the time that I thought it was something worth looking at as a long-term hold.

Not financial advice.

Hopefully you made up your own mind.

TRON is around $0.336.

Hyperliquid is approximately $92.99, up around 2.7%.

Zcash is around $1,312, down approximately 1.6% over 24 hours and roughly 16% over seven days.

Total Crypto Market Cap: approximately $2.93 trillion, up around 0.8%.

Fear & Greed: 68, Greed.

And yes, the longer I do this show, the harder it gets for me to read numbers.

Eventually my brain is just like, “That’s enough words.”

My Take

The level I’m watching today is basically the same one Craig is watching.

Around $87K.

We’ve been moving the Bitcoin floor higher step by step.

First I wanted $80K to $82K.

Then $85K.

Now we’re knocking on the door of $87K.

Craig is looking specifically at the three-month candle high around $87,374.

A clean break through there would be meaningful technically.

But the macro backdrop still matters.

The 10-year Treasury is around 5.25%.

The 30-year is around 5.6%.

Those are enormous yields.

And I’m still not convinced that one weak jobs report means the Fed suddenly stops worrying about inflation.

Maybe I’m wrong.

We’ll see.

The other thing I keep noticing is that while Congress hasn’t passed comprehensive crypto legislation, the actual financial infrastructure keeps moving forward anyway.

Kraken is working on 24/7 institutional settlement.

Tokenized U.S. stocks are moving toward round-the-clock trading.

The SEC is advancing custody rules.

The CFTC is using existing authority.

Companies are building actual products around those rules.

So the market isn’t sitting around waiting for Washington.

It’s moving.

For Bitcoin, though, let’s break $87K.

Then let’s see if we can actually hold it.

Also, shout out to Skyler, who told me Pitbull is apparently dropping something called Pitcoin.

If Pitbull drops Pitcoin, that may officially mean the top is in.

Mr. Worldwide.

Crypto Worldwide.

Have a great Monday.

Happy HODLing

⏱️ The Clock — Where We Landed

Last bottom: Nov 21, 2022 · Last top: Oct 6, 2025 at $126,198
Bottom → Top: 1,050 days · Top → today: Day 362
Projected window: Oct 4 – Oct 17, 2026 — opens today
The cycle low: ~$58,000, June 2026 — set early, confirmed since

⚖️ n = 2, to the very end. We never pretended two cycles could name a date — only a range to watch. The range opens today, and the honest read is that Bitcoin beat it from above. The window became a date the cycle already cleared.

📊 The Final Signal Reading

Seven green. Zero amber. Zero red. The board that spent thirteen weeks split between hope and caution has, in its final reading, gone clean.

🧭 The Journey — Day 300 To Day 362

I launched this Clock on August 2, at Day 300, with Bitcoin in the mid-$60Ks, sentiment buried in fear, and one honest question: where are we in the cycle? Here’s the arc it tracked, Sunday by Sunday:

🔸 Day 300–321: the basing phase — MVRV in the green zone, the capitulation checklist filling in, the signals saying “bottom-territory” while the clock said “early” and the macro said “wait.”
🔸 Day 328–341: the breakout — August’s monthly close stamped the 50-month, the three confirmation flags went up one by one, and the fork began resolving: June’s $58K was the low.
🔸 Day 348–362: the arrival — Bitcoin cleared $80K, then $86K, posted its best September ever, the SEC opened the RIA custody door, and walked up to this window from an 8-month high.

The thesis the Clock carried from the start — bottom came early, institutions front-ran the pattern — is the one that played out. We watched the marker crawl toward the gold band for thirteen Sundays. Today it arrived.

⚖️ The Honest Close

Three things earn a final, honest word:

🐂 What went right: the framework held. It called the bottom-zone early, kept its head through the chop, and resolved bullish without ever overclaiming. The June low looks increasingly permanent.

🐻 What we never knew for sure: the deepest long-term holders never fully capitulated — the one caveat that stood all cycle. The bottom came shallow, which means it came gently, which means a classic deep-flush never arrived. Bullish, but worth remembering the Clock never got its “textbook” capitulation.

🎯 Why it’s right to retire this now: a bottom-watch tool has one job — watch for the bottom. The bottom is in. Keeping a countdown clock running past the event it was built to find would be theater. Better to close it cleanly, on the call it got right, and build the next idea for the next phase.

The Bottom Line — And The Sign-Off

Thirteen Sundays ago this Clock started counting toward a window, holding two ideas at once: that Bitcoin was likely near its bottom, and that two cycles could never prove it. Today the window opens — and Bitcoin enters it at $84,800, up from a $58K June low, carrying a record September, a confirmed trend flip, and a freshly opened institutional door. The bottom is in. The countdown did its job.

So the Cycle Clock retires here, at Day 362, on the call it was built to make. Thank you for reading it every Sunday through the fear and the chop and the breakout. Next Sunday, something new takes this slot — built for the climb ahead, not the bottom behind. The bear is over. The watch is complete.

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator ⚓

💬 Quote of the Week:
“A compliant pathway where none existed before.”
— SEC Chair Paul Atkins, on the new RIA crypto-custody framework (Oct 1)

🎵 Song of the Week: “Dog Days Are Over” — Florence + The Machine — exuberant, cathartic — the sound of a curse finally broken.

📊 Week In One Snapshot

🟧 BTC: $83,865 Mon → record Sep close $83,554 → $87,000+ Fri peak → $84,600 Sat (~flat on the week, wild range)
🔵 ETH: $2,698 → $2,684 (held $2,650+)
🌐 XRP: $1.49 → $1.48
🟣 SOL: $118 → $119 (held $115+)

The Record: September closed ~+6.4%, Bitcoin’s best September ever · 4th straight green September · Q3 +43%
The Unlock: SEC proposed an RIA/fund crypto-custody framework (Oct 1) — the biggest access opening since the ETF
The Whipsaw: soft jobs (+29K) sent BTC past $87K Friday, then a violent rejection erased it (~$600M liquidated)

⏱️ Cycle clock: Day 361 of 363–376 (full analysis tomorrow — the window opens TOMORROW, Oct 4)

📡 PART ONE — THE WEEK THAT WAS

⚓ The 5-Day Arc

📅 Mon–Wed — The Historic Close. Bitcoin sealed its best September on record(+6.4%, 4th straight green September) with a monthly close above $83,600 — shattering the “red September” curse and leaving bears trapped. Q3 finished +43%; ETH’s best quarter ever.

🏛️ Wed–Thu — The Gate Opens. The SEC proposed a tailored crypto-custody framework for RIAs and regulated funds — Chair Atkins called it “a compliant pathway where none existed before.” The biggest institutional-access unlock since the spot ETF, clearing the way for advisors to put clients in Bitcoin.

🚀 Fri AM — $87K. A soft jobs report (just +29K jobs, unemployment up to 4.2%) firmed Fed-pause odds and sent BTC ripping past $87,000 — its highest in ~10 days — as shorts covered and Citi raised its target to $113K.

📉 Fri PM — The Slap. The surge got violently rejected at $87K, BTC plummeting back under $84,000 with ~$600M liquidated — a classic “good news, crowded book” reversal after an 88%-call-skewed options setup met its catalyst.

🧘 Sat — Settled. BTC steadied at ~$84,600, dominance ~59%, roughly flat on the week — the froth flushed, the base intact, the window one day away.

🧠 The Quiet Signal

This was a week of two historic, durable wins and one loud, forgettable headfake — and knowing which is which is the whole game. The durable events: Bitcoin broke the “red September” curse with its best-ever ninth month, and the SEC opened a custody door that lets the advisors managing America’s wealth finally recommend Bitcoin. Those don’t un-happen. They’re structural, permanent, and they compound. The forgettable event: a Friday spike to $87K that got slapped back on a crowded, over-leveraged options book. That round-trip feels like the story because it’s the loudest and most recent, but it changed nothing — BTC ended the week about where it started, froth flushed, base intact. The lesson the week keeps teaching: the headlines that move price today are rarely the events that matter, and the events that matter rarely move price the day they happen. A record monthly close and a regulatory unlock will still be shaping this market long after Friday’s wick is forgotten. Tomorrow the historical bottom window opens — and Bitcoin walks into it at $84K, carrying two permanent wins and a flushed-out book. That’s a strong way to enter the window everyone’s been waiting on all year.

🌅 PART TWO — THE WEEK AHEAD

📅 What’s Coming

⏱️ THE WINDOW OPENS TOMORROW (OCT 4) — the near edge of the historical 363–376-day bottom window. BTC enters it from $84K and an 8-month-high region, not a flush — the “bottom came early” read.
🏛️ RIA CUSTODY COMMENT PERIOD — 60 days of public comment on the SEC proposal; watch for industry response and any acceleration.
📊 CPI OCT 14 + FOMC OCT 28 — October-pause odds firming after the +29K jobs miss; the macro that caps $85K.
🧱 THE $87K WALL — rejected twice now; a two-day close above $87,360 with ETF buying is the bull trigger.

📊 The Levels

🟢 Support: $83,000 (defended repeatedly) → $82,281 (breakout base) → $80,811 → $78,000
🔴 Resistance: $85,000 → $87,360 (the wall) → $90,000 → $95,000

⚓ The Bottom Line

History got made this week and it had nothing to do with Friday’s wick: Bitcoin posted its best September ever and the SEC cleared the custody path for RIAs — two permanent, compounding wins. The $87K spike-and-reject was just the froth flushing out of a crowded book, leaving BTC ~flat on the week with its base intact. Now the main event: the historical bottom window opens tomorrow, and Bitcoin enters it near 8-month highs rather than flushing into it — the strongest possible setup for the “June was the bottom” thesis. Hold $83K, clear $87K, and Uptober does what Uptober does. Rest the body, rest the mind — tomorrow the Cycle Clock reads Day 362 and we step into the window. ⚓

🔑 Powered By OnRamp Bitcoin

Secured by three. Controlled by you.
A week that swung from $87K to $84K on a single wick is exactly the kind that rattles people into rushed moves — and the SEC just reminded everyone that custody is the foundation of it all. OnRamp puts your Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisig vault across three independent regulated institutions: no single party can move it, no seed phrase to lose. Distributed trust — steady through the whipsaw.
Get started: app.onrampbitcoin.com
Not financial advice. Just Bitcoin custody with no single point of failure. 🔑

Stack sats. Stack self-awareness. Both compound.
— The Inspirator

WATCH THIS!