As the Genius Act makes its way through Congress, a fierce debate is brewing over what it could mean for the future of money. The bill, already passed in the Senate and now under consideration in the House, aims to regulate stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to the U.S. dollar. But behind the jargon lies a deeper concern: are we empowering the private sector to control the future of finance?
What’s a Stablecoin, and Why Regulate It?
A stablecoin is a digital asset designed to maintain a stable value—usually pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar. Think of it as the crypto version of a dollar bill. You deposit $1 and receive one token worth $1. But unlike a physical dollar, this token is programmable and potentially traceable on-chain.
The U.S. isn't the only country grappling with how to regulate stablecoins. But with programmable money becoming more common, lawmakers are now rushing to determine what rules should apply—especially as private companies, not governments, are leading the charge.
The Role of Private Companies: Circle and Tether
Two companies dominate the current stablecoin market: Circle (issuer of USDC) and Tether (issuer of USDT). Circle is U.S.-based, recently went public, and is tightly partnered with Coinbase. Tether, while dominant, is more global in scope.
What’s concerning is that private firms—not the Federal Reserve—are shaping the infrastructure for digital dollars. President Trump even signed an executive order blocking the Fed from issuing its own central bank digital currency (CBDC), leaving the door open for private-sector control.
Key Provisions of the Genius Act
Here’s where things get tricky:
Expanded Surveillance: The bill would apply Bank Secrecy Act standards, including KYC (Know Your Customer) and SAR (Suspicious Activity Reports), to stablecoin issuers. Transactions above low thresholds (like $50 in some cases) could be flagged.
Banning Yield: The bill seeks to prohibit yield-bearing stablecoins. That’s a massive shift. Currently, users can park stablecoins in DeFi or fintech platforms and earn 4–5%—comparable to traditional savings accounts. Under the Genius Act, that yield would instead go to the issuer, not the consumer.
"If you aren't able to earn yield on stablecoins, the issuers get to keep all of that yield while still using your cash behind the scenes. That’s regulatory capture.”
Licensing and Gatekeeping: Only financial institutions would be allowed to issue stablecoins. This creates a new barrier to entry—potentially locking out innovative startups unless they partner with incumbents like Coinbase or Circle.
The Slippery Slope of Programmable Money
While private stablecoins could offer faster, cheaper transactions (potentially saving businesses 2–3% in Visa/MasterCard fees), they also open the door to control. If money is programmable, it can be censored. It can be tailored to exclude users or merchants based on politics, location, or even competition.
"I could say USDC isn’t allowed on Blake’s site anymore. That’s my right as a private issuer—and your right as a consumer just disappeared."
When money becomes software, it becomes easy to manipulate—and hard to challenge legally, especially if the issuer is a private company rather than the federal government.
The Rise of Digital Economic Powerhouses
If the Genius Act passes as-is, we could see USDC (and by extension, Coinbase and Circle) controlling a significant portion of the U.S. money supply.
“I can easily see Circle and Coinbase controlling $5 trillion of U.S. GDP in the next 10 years.”
The velocity of digital money—how often it’s spent—means even a modest $500 billion in circulation could represent trillions in annual transactions. And if only a few players are licensed to issue stablecoins, they gain outsized influence over the economy.
Credit Cards, Debit Cards, and the End of Paper Money?
Stablecoins won’t just coexist with traditional banks and payment rails—they could replace them. Small banks may struggle to keep up, while Visa and MasterCard may need to pivot or partner with stablecoin issuers. Debit cards will likely survive as an access point to digital wallets, but credit cards might evolve—or vanish.
“Credit cards are raping poor people with 29% interest while giving us 1.5% cash back. That business model isn’t going anywhere—it’s just going to be rebranded under a new system.”
My Take
There’s a fine line between progress and power grab. The Genius Act could offer much-needed clarity around stablecoin regulation, but it also opens the door to privatized monetary policy, exclusionary systems, and unchecked financial influence.
What worries me most is that the lawmakers pushing this bill may not fully grasp what they’re voting on. Meanwhile, companies like Circle and Coinbase are playing the long game—and they’re doing it well. If we don’t approach this with caution, transparency, and constitutional protections, we risk turning our financial freedom into a corporate API.
Summary:
The Genius Act could reshape the future of money—but who will hold the keys? We’re at a turning point between empowering innovation and entrenching monopolies. Stay informed. Ask hard questions. This isn’t just about crypto—it’s about who controls your dollars.
Happy HODLing, Everyone.
Share this post